Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh vs M/s Exide Industries Ltd Advocate - A. K. Gupte — 2/2023

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 11. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Application MRTU

CNR: MHIC120000252023

Written Statement

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

Filing Number

25/2023

Filing Date

19-01-2023

Registration No

2/2023

Registration Date

19-01-2023

Court

Industrial Court, Pune

Judge

2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union And Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh

Adv. Nitin Bhavar

Respondent(s)

M/s Exide Industries Ltd Advocate - A. K. Gupte

Exide Parivartan Kamgar Sanghtana

Adv. S. T. Mhaske

Hearing History

Judge: 2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.

06-03-2026

Written Statement

13-02-2026

Written Statement

06-02-2026

Written Statement

30-01-2026

Written Statement

23-01-2026

Steps

Interim Orders

09-01-2026
Order Below Exb.

Summary: The Industrial Court at Pune allowed the impleadment application filed by "Exide Parivartan Kamgar Sanghatna" union. The court directed Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh (applicant union) to implead the rival union as party respondent No. 2 by amending its application and filing it before the next date. The court found that all interested parties, including rival unions, must be given an opportunity to be heard on the merits of union recognition under Section 11 of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court at Pune allowed the impleadment application filed by "Exide Parivartan Kamgar Sanghatna" union. The court directed Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh (applicant union) to implead the rival union as party respondent No. 2 by amending its application and filing it before the next date. The court found that all interested parties, including rival unions, must be given an opportunity to be heard on the merits of union recognition under Section 11 of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court, Pune All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case