Chandrakant Jaywant Waghmare vs Nagar Panchayat, Kavathemahankal and ors. Advocate - R. M. Patil / M. H. Gramopadhye — 26/2023
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Hearing below Exh._______. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC100001212023
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
141/2023
Filing Date
19-08-2023
Registration No
26/2023
Registration Date
19-08-2023
Court
Industrial Court ,Sangli
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrakant Jaywant Waghmare
Adv. Jadhav Rahul Nivruti
Respondent(s)
Nagar Panchayat, Kavathemahankal and ors. Advocate - R. M. Patil / M. H. Gramopadhye
Commissioner and The Directorate Municipal Administration Directorate, Mumbai.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 21-02-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 31-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 17-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court at Sangli allowed the complainant's application and directed the respondent (Nagar Panchayat, Kavathemahankal) to produce the complainant's service book and attendance and leave register from 1986 to 2017. The court found these documents relevant and necessary to decide the unfair labour practice complaint regarding non-payment of gratuity, leave encashment, and pension. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court at Sangli allowed the complainant's application and directed the respondent (Nagar Panchayat, Kavathemahankal) to produce the complainant's service book and attendance and leave register from 1986 to 2017. The court found these documents relevant and necessary to decide the unfair labour practice complaint regarding non-payment of gratuity, leave encashment, and pension. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts