Balutai Jadhav vs Range Forest Officer Advocate - Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmantrao — 26/2017
Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 17th March 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC100000852017
Filing Number
85/2017
Filing Date
12-07-2017
Registration No
26/2017
Registration Date
12-07-2017
Court
Industrial Court ,Sangli
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balutai Jadhav
Adv. MULANI B. R.
Respondent(s)
Range Forest Officer Advocate - Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmantrao
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Disposed
Complaince on Order
Complaince on Order
Judgement
Argument
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Complaince on Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Complaince on Order |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Industrial Court at Sangli partially allowed the complaint, finding the Range Forest Officer engaged in unfair labour practice under item 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act by failing to implement a 1994 judgment ordering the complainant's permanency after 32 years. The court directed the respondent to implement the judgment within three months, while declining to order implementation of a 2009 award still pending in High Court challenge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Industrial Court at Sangli partially allowed the complaint, finding the Range Forest Officer engaged in unfair labour practice under item 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act by failing to implement a 1994 judgment ordering the complainant's permanency after 32 years. The court directed the respondent to implement the judgment within three months, while declining to order implementation of a 2009 award still pending in High Court challenge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts