Tushar Mahaling Bhore vs Mukhya Vansanrakshak Pradeshik And Others Advocate - Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmantrao — 30/2025

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC100000692025

Issues

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

Filing Number

82/2025

Filing Date

02-06-2025

Registration No

30/2025

Registration Date

02-06-2025

Court

Industrial Court ,Sangli

Judge

1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Tushar Mahaling Bhore

Adv. Jadhav Umesh Rajaram

Respondent(s)

Mukhya Vansanrakshak Pradeshik And Others Advocate - Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmantrao

Sub Vansanrakshak Pradeshik Sangli

Adv. Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmantrao

Sudhir Vasant Sonawane

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

06-03-2026

Issues

30-01-2026

Issues

20-12-2025

Issues

21-11-2025

Issues

29-10-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

11-08-2025
Order Below Exb.

The Industrial Court, Sangli rejected the interim stay application filed by Forest Forester Tushar Mahaling Bhore against his transfer order dated 30.05.2025 from Sangli to Dahiwadi (Satara Division). The court found no prima facie case of unfair labor practices, as the complainant failed to provide cogent evidence that the transfer was mala fide or violated statutory rules, and noted that transfer is an incident of service wherein administrative exigencies override employee preferences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Industrial Court, Sangli rejected the interim stay application filed by Forest Forester Tushar Mahaling Bhore against his transfer order dated 30.05.2025 from Sangli to Dahiwadi (Satara Division). The court found no prima facie case of unfair labor practices, as the complainant failed to provide cogent evidence that the transfer was mala fide or violated statutory rules, and noted that transfer is an incident of service wherein administrative exigencies override employee preferences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court ,Sangli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case