Tushar Mahaling Bhore vs Mukhya Vansanrakshak Pradeshik And Others Advocate - Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmantrao — 30/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC100000692025
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
Filing Number
82/2025
Filing Date
02-06-2025
Registration No
30/2025
Registration Date
02-06-2025
Court
Industrial Court ,Sangli
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tushar Mahaling Bhore
Adv. Jadhav Umesh Rajaram
Respondent(s)
Mukhya Vansanrakshak Pradeshik And Others Advocate - Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmantrao
Sub Vansanrakshak Pradeshik Sangli
Adv. Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmantrao
Sudhir Vasant Sonawane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Issues |
| 30-01-2026 | Issues |
| 20-12-2025 | Issues |
| 21-11-2025 | Issues |
| 29-10-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
The Industrial Court, Sangli rejected the interim stay application filed by Forest Forester Tushar Mahaling Bhore against his transfer order dated 30.05.2025 from Sangli to Dahiwadi (Satara Division). The court found no prima facie case of unfair labor practices, as the complainant failed to provide cogent evidence that the transfer was mala fide or violated statutory rules, and noted that transfer is an incident of service wherein administrative exigencies override employee preferences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Industrial Court, Sangli rejected the interim stay application filed by Forest Forester Tushar Mahaling Bhore against his transfer order dated 30.05.2025 from Sangli to Dahiwadi (Satara Division). The court found no prima facie case of unfair labor practices, as the complainant failed to provide cogent evidence that the transfer was mala fide or violated statutory rules, and noted that transfer is an incident of service wherein administrative exigencies override employee preferences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts