Mutyappa Ramappa Ballari vs Nagar Panchayat, Kavate Mahankhal and Ors Advocate - R. M. Patil / M. H. Gramopadhye — 20/2024

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Hearing below Exh._______. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Hearing below Exh._______ Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC100000672024

Filing Number

72/2024

Filing Date

31-Jul-2024

Registration No

20/2024

Registration Date

31-Jul-2024

Court

Industrial Court ,Sangli

Judge

1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mutyappa Ramappa Ballari

    Adv. Jadhav Rahul Nivruti

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagar Panchayat, Kavate Mahankhal and Ors Advocate - R. M. Patil / M. H. Gramopadhye

  2. 2.commissioner and the Directorate Municipal Administration DirectorateMumbai

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Order Below Exb.View PDF

    Summary: The Industrial Court at Sangli allowed the complainant's application and directed the Nagar Panchayat, Kavate Mahankhal to produce the complainant's service book and attendance and leave registers from 1995 to 2024. The court found these documents relevant and necessary to determine whether the complainant is entitled to gratuity, leave encashment, and pension benefits under Municipal rules in his unfair labour practice complaint. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  8. 02-Jan-2026

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Complainant Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  13. 17-Sep-2025

    Complainant Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  14. 13-Aug-2025

    Complainant Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  15. 10-Jul-2025

    Complainant Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  16. 21-Jun-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  17. 03-May-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  18. 29-Mar-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  19. 15-Feb-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  20. 18-Jan-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  21. 04-Jan-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  22. 07-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  23. 15-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  24. 19-Oct-2024

    Appearnce

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  25. 20-Sep-2024

    Appearnce

    Member, Industrial Court, Sangli

  26. 26-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 31-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court at Sangli allowed the complainant's application and directed the Nagar Panchayat, Kavate Mahankhal to produce the complainant's service book and attendance and leave registers from 1995 to 2024. The court found these documents relevant and necessary to determine whether the complainant is entitled to gratuity, leave encashment, and pension benefits under Municipal rules in his unfair labour practice complaint. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case