Mutyappa Ramappa Ballari vs Nagar Panchayat, Kavate Mahankhal and Ors Advocate - R. M. Patil / M. H. Gramopadhye — 20/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Hearing below Exh._______. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC100000672024
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
72/2024
Filing Date
31-07-2024
Registration No
20/2024
Registration Date
31-07-2024
Court
Industrial Court ,Sangli
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mutyappa Ramappa Ballari
Adv. Jadhav Rahul Nivruti
Respondent(s)
Nagar Panchayat, Kavate Mahankhal and Ors Advocate - R. M. Patil / M. H. Gramopadhye
commissioner and the Directorate Municipal Administration DirectorateMumbai
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 21-02-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 31-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 17-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court at Sangli allowed the complainant's application and directed the Nagar Panchayat, Kavate Mahankhal to produce the complainant's service book and attendance and leave registers from 1995 to 2024. The court found these documents relevant and necessary to determine whether the complainant is entitled to gratuity, leave encashment, and pension benefits under Municipal rules in his unfair labour practice complaint. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court at Sangli allowed the complainant's application and directed the Nagar Panchayat, Kavate Mahankhal to produce the complainant's service book and attendance and leave registers from 1995 to 2024. The court found these documents relevant and necessary to determine whether the complainant is entitled to gratuity, leave encashment, and pension benefits under Municipal rules in his unfair labour practice complaint. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts