(Sidram Karande) Legal Heairs Smt. Jakavva S. Karande and Others vs Vasantdada Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar karkhana Ltd. and one Advocate - Mutalik Sandeep Shashikant — 31/2019
Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC100000502019
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
50/2019
Filing Date
12-03-2019
Registration No
31/2019
Registration Date
12-03-2019
Court
Industrial Court ,Sangli
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
(Sidram Karande) Legal Heairs Smt. Jakavva S. Karande and Others
Adv. Yadav Dhairyasheel Shamarao
Respondent(s)
Vasantdada Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar karkhana Ltd. and one Advocate - Mutalik Sandeep Shashikant
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 18-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 28-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 16-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 12-12-2025 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court rejected the respondent's application seeking to frame a preliminary issue on limitation grounds. The court held that the complainant's claim for unpaid wages constitutes a continuous and recurring cause of action under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, which does not require a delay condonation application. The complaint is allowed to proceed further on merits, with the limitation issue to be decided alongside other issues after evidence is presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court rejected the respondent's application seeking to frame a preliminary issue on limitation grounds. The court held that the complainant's claim for unpaid wages constitutes a continuous and recurring cause of action under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, which does not require a delay condonation application. The complaint is allowed to proceed further on merits, with the limitation issue to be decided alongside other issues after evidence is presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts