Kadaranma Kulayappa Ballari vs Nagar Panchayat Kavate Mahankhal and Ors 1 Advocate - R. M. Patil / Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmantrao — 24/2021
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Hearing below Exh._______. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC100000432021
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
52/2021
Filing Date
12-07-2021
Registration No
24/2021
Registration Date
12-07-2021
Court
Industrial Court ,Sangli
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kadaranma Kulayappa Ballari
Adv. Jadhav Rahul Nivruti
Respondent(s)
Nagar Panchayat Kavate Mahankhal and Ors 1 Advocate - R. M. Patil / Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmantrao
Commissioner and the Directorate Municipal Adminidtration Directorate Mumbai
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 21-02-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 31-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 17-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court at Sangli allowed the complainant's application and directed the respondent Nagar Panchayat to produce the complainant's service book, attendance records, and leave register from 2002-2020. The court found these documents relevant and necessary to decide the unfair labour practice complaint regarding withheld gratuity, leave encashment, and pension benefits. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court at Sangli allowed the complainant's application and directed the respondent Nagar Panchayat to produce the complainant's service book, attendance records, and leave register from 2002-2020. The court found these documents relevant and necessary to decide the unfair labour practice complaint regarding withheld gratuity, leave encashment, and pension benefits. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts