Vilas Maruti Kadam vs Divisional Controller, S. T. Sangli. and ors. 1 Advocate - Yadav Dhairyasheel Shamarao — 18/2023
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC100000402023
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
Filing Number
54/2023
Filing Date
12-05-2023
Registration No
18/2023
Registration Date
12-05-2023
Court
Industrial Court ,Sangli
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vilas Maruti Kadam
Adv. Mutaalik Sanadiip Shashikant
Respondent(s)
Divisional Controller, S. T. Sangli. and ors. 1 Advocate - Yadav Dhairyasheel Shamarao
Divisional Traffic Officer, S. T. Sangli.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Cross Examination
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 06-02-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 16-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 12-12-2025 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
Interim Orders
The Industrial Court at Sangli allowed the respondent's application to frame an additional issue regarding the maintainability of the complaint. The court framed Issue No. 2(a): "Whether the present complaint is pre-mature and hence not maintainable?" to be decided on merit later, noting the respondent's contention that the domestic inquiry had not concluded. The complainant's argument regarding retirement on 31.5.2023 was deferred for consideration during final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Industrial Court at Sangli allowed the respondent's application to frame an additional issue regarding the maintainability of the complaint. The court framed Issue No. 2(a): "Whether the present complaint is pre-mature and hence not maintainable?" to be decided on merit later, noting the respondent's contention that the domestic inquiry had not concluded. The complainant's argument regarding retirement on 31.5.2023 was deferred for consideration during final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts