Ninaidevi Sakhar Kamgar Union (INTUC) vs Ninaidevi Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Advocate - Rane Satyajit Rajendr — 1/2020
Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 31(2). Status: Respondent Evidence. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
M.A. ULP Restoration - Miscellaneous App ULP Resto.
CNR: MHIC100000232020
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
43/2020
Filing Date
11-03-2020
Registration No
1/2020
Registration Date
16-03-2020
Court
Industrial Court ,Sangli
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ninaidevi Sakhar Kamgar Union (INTUC)
Adv. Mutaalik Sanadiip Shashikant
Respondent(s)
Ninaidevi Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Advocate - Rane Satyajit Rajendr
Dalmiya Bharat Sugar and Industries Ltd.
Adv. Rane Satyajit Rajendr
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
| 09-01-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
| 19-12-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document records cross-examination proceedings in Misc. Application (ULP) No. 01 of 2020 before the Industrial Court, Sangli, resumed on 12.08.2025. The witness, an office bearer of the applicant union, was cross-examined by the opponent No.3's advocate regarding claims in an earlier ULP Complaint No.194/2014 involving a sugar factory, and testified on matters including the business takeover by opponent No.3, wage depositions, and industrial relations. Cross-examination was completed with no re-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records cross-examination proceedings in Misc. Application (ULP) No. 01 of 2020 before the Industrial Court, Sangli, resumed on 12.08.2025. The witness, an office bearer of the applicant union, was cross-examined by the opponent No.3's advocate regarding claims in an earlier ULP Complaint No.194/2014 involving a sugar factory, and testified on matters including the business takeover by opponent No.3, wage depositions, and industrial relations. Cross-examination was completed with no re-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts