Municipal Transport Workers Union vs Kolhapur Municipal Transport Advocate - P. R. Rane — 192/2021

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC090004052021

Filing Number

414/2021

Filing Date

18-Nov-2021

Registration No

192/2021

Registration Date

19-Nov-2021

Court

Industrial Court, Kolhapur

Judge

1-Member, Industrial Court No. 1

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Municipal Transport Workers Union

    Adv. V. S. Chavan

  2. 2.Balawant Vitthal Patil

    Adv. V. S. Chavan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kolhapur Municipal Transport Advocate - P. R. Rane

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  7. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  9. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  10. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  11. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  12. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  13. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  14. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  15. 14-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  16. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  17. 27-Nov-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  18. 14-Nov-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  19. 17-Oct-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  20. 26-Sep-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  21. 17-Aug-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  22. 08-Aug-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  23. 01-Aug-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  24. 18-Jul-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  25. 24-Jun-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  26. 25-Apr-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  27. 06-Apr-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  28. 14-Mar-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  29. 17-Feb-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  30. 24-Jan-2024

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  31. 22-Dec-2023

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  32. 08-Dec-2023

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  33. 23-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  34. 26-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  35. 05-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  36. 09-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  37. 02-Sep-2023

    Settlement

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  38. 07-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  39. 12-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  40. 14-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  41. 12-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  42. 09-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  43. 09-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  44. 18-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  45. 08-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  46. 12-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  47. 08-Nov-2022

    Settlement

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  48. 31-Oct-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  49. 10-Oct-2022

    Order below Exh.View PDF

    Summary: The Industrial Court No.1, Maharashtra at Kolhapur rejected the respondent's application seeking production of caveats filed by the complainant union. The court found that the respondent failed to demonstrate the relevance of the requested documents and that the locus-standi issue had already been raised in an earlier application, with the court directing it to be decided at the appropriate stage. The court held that parties cannot conduct "fishing inquiries" and must establish necessity before document production is ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  50. 10-Oct-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  51. 06-Oct-2022

    Order Below Exh.______

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  52. 28-Sep-2022

    Hearing below Exh. ____

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  53. 14-Sep-2022

    Hearing below Exh. ____

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  54. 29-Aug-2022

    Hearing below Exh. ____

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  55. 20-Aug-2022

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  56. 14-Jul-2022

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  57. 14-Jun-2022

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  58. 26-Apr-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  59. 29-Mar-2022

    Order below Exh.View PDF

  60. 29-Mar-2022

    Order below Exh.View PDF

  61. 29-Mar-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  62. 17-Mar-2022

    Order Below Exh.______

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  63. 28-Feb-2022

    Hearing below Exh. ____

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  64. 17-Feb-2022

    Hearing below Exh. ____

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  65. 10-Feb-2022

    Hearing below Exh. ____

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  66. 24-Jan-2022

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  67. 12-Jan-2022

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  68. 15-Dec-2021

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  69. 03-Dec-2021

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 1

  70. 20-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  71. 18-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 192/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court No.1, Maharashtra at Kolhapur rejected the respondent's application seeking production of caveats filed by the complainant union. The court found that the respondent failed to demonstrate the relevance of the requested documents and that the locus-standi issue had already been raised in an earlier application, with the court directing it to be decided at the appropriate stage. The court held that parties cannot conduct "fishing inquiries" and must establish necessity before document production is ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case