Municipal Transport Workers Union vs Kolhapur Municipal Transport Advocate - P. R. Rane — 192/2021
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC090004052021
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
Filing Number
414/2021
Filing Date
18-11-2021
Registration No
192/2021
Registration Date
19-11-2021
Court
Industrial Court, Kolhapur
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court No. 1
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Municipal Transport Workers Union
Adv. V. S. Chavan
Balawant Vitthal Patil
Adv. V. S. Chavan
Respondent(s)
Kolhapur Municipal Transport Advocate - P. R. Rane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court No. 1
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court No.1, Maharashtra at Kolhapur rejected the respondent's application seeking production of caveats filed by the complainant union. The court found that the respondent failed to demonstrate the relevance of the requested documents and that the locus-standi issue had already been raised in an earlier application, with the court directing it to be decided at the appropriate stage. The court held that parties cannot conduct "fishing inquiries" and must establish necessity before document production is ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court No.1, Maharashtra at Kolhapur rejected the respondent's application seeking production of caveats filed by the complainant union. The court found that the respondent failed to demonstrate the relevance of the requested documents and that the locus-standi issue had already been raised in an earlier application, with the court directing it to be decided at the appropriate stage. The court held that parties cannot conduct "fishing inquiries" and must establish necessity before document production is ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts