Shree Hanuman Services vs E. S. I. Corporation, Pune Advocate - S. V. Thorat — 3/2021
Case under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Status: Evidence of Respondent. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Application ESI
CNR: MHIC090003892021
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
396/2021
Filing Date
11-11-2021
Registration No
3/2021
Registration Date
12-11-2021
Court
Industrial Court, Kolhapur
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court No. 1
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shree Hanuman Services
Adv. D. S. Joshi
Respondent(s)
E. S. I. Corporation, Pune Advocate - S. V. Thorat
The Assistant Director, E. S. I. Corporation, Pune
The Recovery Officer, E. S. I. Corporation, Pune
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court No. 1
Evidence of Respondent
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence of Respondent |
| 16-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 05-12-2025 | Cross Examination |
| 14-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 03-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a court transcript from an ESI (Employees' State Insurance) matter (A(ESI)No.03/2019) before the Employees' Insurance Court, Kolhapur, documenting the cross-examination and testimony of a witness regarding challenged ESI contribution notices (C-18 and C-19). The witness testified about their establishment's ESI coverage initiation, employee count, contribution rates for rural vs. municipality areas, and disputed the allegations of short contribution payment. The witness was discharged after cross-examination with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a court transcript from an ESI (Employees' State Insurance) matter (A(ESI)No.03/2019) before the Employees' Insurance Court, Kolhapur, documenting the cross-examination and testimony of a witness regarding challenged ESI contribution notices (C-18 and C-19). The witness testified about their establishment's ESI coverage initiation, employee count, contribution rates for rural vs. municipality areas, and disputed the allegations of short contribution payment. The witness was discharged after cross-examination with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts