Municipal Transport Workers Union vs Kolhapur Municipal Transport Advocate - P. R. Rane — 159/2021

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC090003622021

Cross Examination

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

Filing Number

364/2021

Filing Date

14-10-2021

Registration No

159/2021

Registration Date

20-10-2021

Court

Industrial Court, Kolhapur

Judge

1-Member, Industrial Court No. 1

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union And Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Municipal Transport Workers Union

Adv. V. S. Chavan

Rajekhan Gajabar Mullani

Adv. V. S. Chavan

Respondent(s)

Kolhapur Municipal Transport Advocate - P. R. Rane

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court No. 1

06-03-2026

Cross Examination

18-02-2026

Cross Examination

17-01-2026

Evidence

12-12-2025

Evidence

07-11-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-10-2022
Order below Exh.

Summary: The Industrial Court No.1, Maharashtra at Kolhapur rejected the respondent's application seeking direction to the Municipal Transport Workers Union to produce copies of caveats filed before the Registrar and Labour Court. The court found the application to be a replica of an earlier application (Exh.C-5) already rejected the same day and deemed it not maintainable during the pendency of the earlier application. The underlying complaint (ULP No. 159/2021) is directed to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court No.1, Maharashtra at Kolhapur rejected the respondent's application seeking direction to the Municipal Transport Workers Union to produce copies of caveats filed before the Registrar and Labour Court. The court found the application to be a replica of an earlier application (Exh.C-5) already rejected the same day and deemed it not maintainable during the pendency of the earlier application. The underlying complaint (ULP No. 159/2021) is directed to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court, Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case