M/s S. S. Mirje and Co. vs E. S. I. Corporation Advocate - S. V. Thorat — 9/2020
Case under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Application ESI
CNR: MHIC090002022020
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
200/2020
Filing Date
20-11-2020
Registration No
9/2020
Registration Date
21-11-2020
Court
Industrial Court, Kolhapur
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court No. 1
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s S. S. Mirje and Co.
Adv. D. S. Desai
Respondent(s)
E. S. I. Corporation Advocate - S. V. Thorat
Deputy Director, E. S. I. Corporation
Recovery Officer, E. S. I. Corporation
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court No. 1
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 27-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 25-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 27-01-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
| 19-11-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document records cross-examination proceedings in ESI Application No. 09/2020 before Industrial Court No. 1, Kolhapur, dated 13.09.2024. The witness (applicant's representative) testified regarding ESI registration, address changes, contribution payments, and challenged communications (C-18, C-19, CP-2), asserting the applicant is entitled to a refund of Rs. 76,221 in excess contributions and denying liability for additional amounts claimed by opponents. The witness was discharged after cross-examination with no re-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records cross-examination proceedings in ESI Application No. 09/2020 before Industrial Court No. 1, Kolhapur, dated 13.09.2024. The witness (applicant's representative) testified regarding ESI registration, address changes, contribution payments, and challenged communications (C-18, C-19, CP-2), asserting the applicant is entitled to a refund of Rs. 76,221 in excess contributions and denying liability for additional amounts claimed by opponents. The witness was discharged after cross-examination with no re-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts