Sandip Manohar Madhale vs Ichalkaranji Municipal Corporation and 5 Ors. Advocate - R. L. Chavan, R. L. Chavan, R. L. ChavanR. L. Chavan,, R. L. ChavanR. L. Chavan,R. L. Chavan, — 54/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Documents Issues. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC090001352025
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
137/2025
Filing Date
18-07-2025
Registration No
54/2025
Registration Date
18-07-2025
Court
Industrial Court, Kolhapur
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court No. 1
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandip Manohar Madhale
Adv. V. S. Chavan
Respondent(s)
Ichalkaranji Municipal Corporation and 5 Ors. Advocate - R. L. Chavan, R. L. Chavan, R. L. ChavanR. L. Chavan,, R. L. ChavanR. L. Chavan,R. L. Chavan,
Sachin Krushnath Bhute, Sanitary Inspector
Vinod Dinkar Jadhav, Sanitary Inspector
Sangram Dagdu Bhore, Sanitary Inspector
Suraj Dayanand Malge, Sanitary Inspector
Kiran Maruti Lakhe, Sanitary Inspector
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court No. 1
Documents Issues
Interim Application Order
Interim Application Order
Interim Application Order
Argument on Interim Relief
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Documents Issues |
| 05-03-2026 | Interim Application Order |
| 04-03-2026 | Interim Application Order |
| 23-02-2026 | Interim Application Order |
| 17-02-2026 | Argument on Interim Relief |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court at Kolhapur rejected the interim relief application filed by Shri Sandip Manohar Madhale under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court found that the complainant failed to demonstrate a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss, and held that the preliminary jurisdictional issue of whether the complainant qualifies as a "workman" must be decided on merits before any interim relief can be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court at Kolhapur rejected the interim relief application filed by Shri Sandip Manohar Madhale under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court found that the complainant failed to demonstrate a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss, and held that the preliminary jurisdictional issue of whether the complainant qualifies as a "workman" must be decided on merits before any interim relief can be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts