Nitin Mohan Powar vs Mahalaxmi Enterprises Advocate - D. S. Desai — 32/2022

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Argument Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC090001002022

Filing Number

104/2022

Filing Date

26-Apr-2022

Registration No

32/2022

Registration Date

27-Apr-2022

Court

Industrial Court, Kolhapur

Judge

2-Member, Industrial Court No. 2

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nitin Mohan Powar

    Adv. V. M. Kuigade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahalaxmi Enterprises Advocate - D. S. Desai

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  3. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence of Complianant

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence of Complianant

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence of Complianant

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence of Complianant

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence of Complianant

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence of Complianant

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence of Complianant

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence of Complianant

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  11. 03-Sep-2025

    Order below Exh.View PDF

    Summary: The Industrial Court at Kolhapur found that it has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint and rejected the respondent's jurisdictional challenge. The court held that although the complainant's unpaid salary, bonus, and leave encashment claims (October 2019–December 2020) relate to work performed at Pune, the court can still exercise jurisdiction because: (1) the respondent's head office is located in Kolhapur, (2) the complainant is a permanent Kolhapur resident, and (3) the respondent's reply letter dated 15/11/2021 was issued from Kolhapur, creating multiple causes of action within Kolhapur's jurisdiction. The case proceeds to the evidence stage on remaining substantive issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  13. 30-Aug-2025

    Award

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  14. 12-Aug-2025

    Argument

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  15. 15-Jul-2025

    Argument

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  16. 17-Jun-2025

    Order below Exh.View PDF

  17. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  18. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  19. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  20. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  21. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  22. 17-Jan-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  23. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  24. 13-Dec-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  25. 12-Nov-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  26. 08-Oct-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  27. 13-Sep-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  28. 21-Aug-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  29. 23-Jul-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  30. 19-Jun-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  31. 12-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  32. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  33. 16-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  34. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  35. 29-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  36. 25-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  37. 03-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  38. 29-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  39. 25-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  40. 13-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  41. 11-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  42. 02-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  43. 31-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  44. 20-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  45. 22-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  46. 17-Oct-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  47. 06-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  48. 01-Sep-2022

    Written Statement

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  49. 27-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  50. 22-Jun-2022

    Written Statement

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  51. 06-Jun-2022

    Apparance

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  52. 29-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 26-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court at Kolhapur found that it has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint and rejected the respondent's jurisdictional challenge. The court held that although the complainant's unpaid salary, bonus, and leave encashment claims (October 2019–December 2020) relate to work performed at Pune, the court can still exercise jurisdiction because: (1) the respondent's head office is located in Kolhapur, (2) the complainant is a permanent Kolhapur resident, and (3) the respondent's reply letter dated 15/11/2021 was issued from Kolhapur, creating multiple causes of action within Kolhapur's jurisdiction. The case proceeds to the evidence stage on remaining substantive issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case