Shri. Shashikant Gajanan Khot vs Ganesh Foundry Pvt. Ltd Advocate - D. S. Joshi — 42/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC090000842024
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
93/2024
Filing Date
09-05-2024
Registration No
42/2024
Registration Date
09-05-2024
Court
Industrial Court, Kolhapur
Judge
2-Member, Industrial Court No. 2
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Shashikant Gajanan Khot
Adv. V. S. Chavan, R. S. Rane
Shri. Vinayak Nana Sutar
Shri. Dastgir Nijam Mulla
Shri. Vitthal Bapurao Kurle
Shri. Akabar Nijam Mulla
Respondent(s)
Ganesh Foundry Pvt. Ltd Advocate - D. S. Joshi
Shri. Ramesh Gajanan Kulkarni
Shri. Ramesh Gajanan Kulkarni,
Shri. Harshavardhan Ramesh Kulkarni
Shri. Harshvardhan Kulkarni
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Member, Industrial Court No. 2
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court allowed the complainant's application to amend the complaint filed in an unfair labour practice case. Permission was granted to correct the respondent company's name from "Ganesh Foundry Private Limited" to "Shri Ganesh Foundry Private Limited," finding the omission to be a minor, pardonable oversight causing no prejudice to the respondent. The complainant was directed to file the amended complaint within the stipulated time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court allowed the complainant's application to amend the complaint filed in an unfair labour practice case. Permission was granted to correct the respondent company's name from "Ganesh Foundry Private Limited" to "Shri Ganesh Foundry Private Limited," finding the omission to be a minor, pardonable oversight causing no prejudice to the respondent. The complainant was directed to file the amended complaint within the stipulated time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts