Balaso Pandurang Pandav vs Mechanical Engineer, M. S. R. T. C., Kolhapur Advocate - V. S. Chavan — 9/2026

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 44. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Argument Next hearing 06-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Revn. Appln. ULP

CNR: MHIC090000462026

Filing Number

46/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Industrial Court, Kolhapur

Judge

2-Member, Industrial Court No. 2

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 44

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balaso Pandurang Pandav

    Adv. S. D. Salokhe

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineer, M. S. R. T. C., Kolhapur Advocate - V. S. Chavan

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Order below Exh.View PDF

    Summary: The Industrial Court rejected the petitioner's application seeking to keep the termination order dated 27/02/2026 in abeyance pending revision proceedings. The court held that under Section 5 of the M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act, 1971, discharge or dismissal matters fall under Item-1 of Schedule-IV and are outside the Industrial Court's jurisdiction, which must be addressed before the Labour Court instead. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Argument

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Say

    Member, Industrial Court No. 2

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Order below Exh.View PDF

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court rejected the petitioner's application seeking to keep the termination order dated 27/02/2026 in abeyance pending revision proceedings. The court held that under Section 5 of the M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act, 1971, discharge or dismissal matters fall under Item-1 of Schedule-IV and are outside the Industrial Court's jurisdiction, which must be addressed before the Labour Court instead. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case