Shri. Aktar Habib Tadvi vs Depot Manager, MSRTC, Palghar Advocate - Amruta Rajaram Patil — 175/2023
Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28. Status: Hearing on Preliminary Issue. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC040003342023
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
Filing Number
430/2023
Filing Date
16-09-2023
Registration No
175/2023
Registration Date
18-09-2023
Court
Industrial Court,Thane
Judge
1-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Aktar Habib Tadvi
Adv. Gharat Chitra N.
Respondent(s)
Depot Manager, MSRTC, Palghar Advocate - Amruta Rajaram Patil
The Divisional Controller MSRTC Palghar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member
Hearing on Preliminary Issue
Hearing on Preliminary Issue
Hearing on Preliminary Issue
Hearing on Preliminary Issue
Hearing on Preliminary Issue
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Hearing on Preliminary Issue |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing on Preliminary Issue |
| 13-02-2026 | Hearing on Preliminary Issue |
| 02-02-2026 | Hearing on Preliminary Issue |
| 09-01-2026 | Hearing on Preliminary Issue |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court at Thane, Maharashtra framed seven issues in this Unfair Labour Practice (ULP) complaint filed by employee Aktar Habib Tadvi against Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, challenging a punishment order imposed after an inquiry. The court will decide whether the inquiry was fair, whether the findings were supported by evidence, whether misconduct charges are proven, and whether the punishment is disproportionate. The court directed that issues regarding inquiry fairness and findings' perversity will be decided based on original inquiry papers without permitting additional evidence from parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court at Thane, Maharashtra framed seven issues in this Unfair Labour Practice (ULP) complaint filed by employee Aktar Habib Tadvi against Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, challenging a punishment order imposed after an inquiry. The court will decide whether the inquiry was fair, whether the findings were supported by evidence, whether misconduct charges are proven, and whether the punishment is disproportionate. The court directed that issues regarding inquiry fairness and findings' perversity will be decided based on original inquiry papers without permitting additional evidence from parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts