Shri. Aktar Habib Tadvi vs Depot Manager, MSRTC, Palghar Advocate - Amruta Rajaram Patil — 175/2023

Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28. Status: Hearing on Preliminary Issue. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC040003342023

Hearing on Preliminary Issue

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

Filing Number

430/2023

Filing Date

16-09-2023

Registration No

175/2023

Registration Date

18-09-2023

Court

Industrial Court,Thane

Judge

1-Member

Acts & Sections

Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Shri. Aktar Habib Tadvi

Adv. Gharat Chitra N.

Respondent(s)

Depot Manager, MSRTC, Palghar Advocate - Amruta Rajaram Patil

The Divisional Controller MSRTC Palghar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Member

23-03-2026

Hearing on Preliminary Issue

06-03-2026

Hearing on Preliminary Issue

13-02-2026

Hearing on Preliminary Issue

02-02-2026

Hearing on Preliminary Issue

09-01-2026

Hearing on Preliminary Issue

Interim Orders

09-01-2026
Order Below Exh.

Summary: The Industrial Court at Thane, Maharashtra framed seven issues in this Unfair Labour Practice (ULP) complaint filed by employee Aktar Habib Tadvi against Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, challenging a punishment order imposed after an inquiry. The court will decide whether the inquiry was fair, whether the findings were supported by evidence, whether misconduct charges are proven, and whether the punishment is disproportionate. The court directed that issues regarding inquiry fairness and findings' perversity will be decided based on original inquiry papers without permitting additional evidence from parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court at Thane, Maharashtra framed seven issues in this Unfair Labour Practice (ULP) complaint filed by employee Aktar Habib Tadvi against Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, challenging a punishment order imposed after an inquiry. The court will decide whether the inquiry was fair, whether the findings were supported by evidence, whether misconduct charges are proven, and whether the punishment is disproportionate. The court directed that issues regarding inquiry fairness and findings' perversity will be decided based on original inquiry papers without permitting additional evidence from parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Industrial Court,Thane All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case