Shri. Satish Ekanath Kamble vs Divisional Controller M. S. R. T. C. Thane Division Advocate - Smita H. Danke — 150/2022

Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28. Status: Cross. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Cross Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC040002522022

Filing Number

292/2022

Filing Date

25-Jul-2022

Registration No

150/2022

Registration Date

25-Jul-2022

Court

Industrial Court,Thane

Judge

1-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri. Satish Ekanath Kamble

    Adv. U.S.Jagdale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Divisional Controller M. S. R. T. C. Thane Division Advocate - Smita H. Danke

  2. 2.M. S. R. T. C. Mumbai Through Divisional Controller

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Cross

    Member

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh.

    Member

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Member

  5. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Member

  6. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  7. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  10. 18-Aug-2025

    Order Below Exh.View PDF

    The Industrial Court at Thane found the inquiry against complainant Satish Eknath Kamble (an MSRTC accountant) to be unfair and improper, violating natural justice principles. The court held that the Inquiry Officer's findings were perverse and unsupported by evidence, particularly because the inquiry was conducted ex-parte on 30-12-2020 without granting the complainant's adjournment request and without allowing him to present a defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  12. 11-Aug-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  14. 08-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  15. 20-Jun-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  16. 05-May-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  17. 22-Apr-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  18. 24-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  19. 10-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  20. 17-Feb-2025

    Hearing Below Exh

    Member

  21. 03-Feb-2025

    Hearing Below Exh

    Member

  22. 27-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh.

    Member

  23. 06-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh.

    Member

  24. 18-Nov-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  25. 18-Oct-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  26. 07-Oct-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  27. 09-Sep-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  28. 12-Aug-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  29. 15-Jul-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  30. 24-Jun-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  31. 22-Apr-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  32. 08-Apr-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  33. 11-Mar-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  34. 12-Feb-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  35. 08-Jan-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  36. 11-Dec-2023

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  37. 01-Dec-2023

    Order Below Exh.View PDF

  38. 01-Dec-2023

    Hearing on Preliminary Issue

    Member

  39. 06-Nov-2023

    Cross

    Member

  40. 09-Oct-2023

    Cross

    Member

  41. 18-Sep-2023

    Cross

    Member

  42. 25-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Member

  43. 07-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Member

  44. 09-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Member

  45. 17-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Member

  46. 10-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  47. 13-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  48. 16-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  49. 12-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    Member

  50. 21-Nov-2022

    Appearance

    Member

  51. 10-Oct-2022

    Appearance

    Member

  52. 12-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    Member

  53. 12-Aug-2022

    Appearance

    Member

  54. 29-Jul-2022

    Service Report

    Member

  55. 26-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 25-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 150/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Industrial Court at Thane found the inquiry against complainant Satish Eknath Kamble (an MSRTC accountant) to be unfair and improper, violating natural justice principles. The court held that the Inquiry Officer's findings were perverse and unsupported by evidence, particularly because the inquiry was conducted ex-parte on 30-12-2020 without granting the complainant's adjournment request and without allowing him to present a defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case