Ganesh Budhaji Vadhavinde vs Zilla Parishad Thane — 87/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Disposed: Uncontested--OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC040001552025
Filing Number
251/2025
Filing Date
22-05-2025
Registration No
87/2025
Registration Date
22-05-2025
Court
Industrial Court,Thane
Judge
2-Member
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Budhaji Vadhavinde
Adv. N.M.Shivkar
Respondent(s)
Zilla Parishad Thane
The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Thane
Block Development Officer
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Member
Disposed
Ex-Party Order
Ex Party Hearing
Ex-party Evidence
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Ex-Party Order |
| 25-02-2026 | Ex Party Hearing |
| 23-02-2026 | Ex-party Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Written Statement |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Industrial Court of Maharashtra at Thane found that Zilla Parishad Thane engaged in unfair labor practices under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 by transferring Gram Panchayat Adhikari Ganesh Vadhavinde without following the prescribed Government Resolution guidelines, violating principles of natural justice, and disregarding his earlier tribal area service. The court quashed the transfer order dated 19.05.2025 and directed the respondents to allow the complainant to rejoin at his original posting in Dapode while paying regular wages, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Industrial Court of Maharashtra at Thane found that Zilla Parishad Thane engaged in unfair labor practices under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 by transferring Gram Panchayat Adhikari Ganesh Vadhavinde without following the prescribed Government Resolution guidelines, violating principles of natural justice, and disregarding his earlier tribal area service. The court quashed the transfer order dated 19.05.2025 and directed the respondents to allow the complainant to rejoin at his original posting in Dapode while paying regular wages, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts