Shri.Ravindra Budha Landge vs Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T. Corporation, Paghar Div. and anr., Advocate - Smita H. Danke — 13/2020
Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 06th March 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC040000162020
Filing Number
17/2020
Filing Date
08-01-2020
Registration No
13/2020
Registration Date
08-01-2020
Court
Industrial Court,Thane
Judge
2-Member
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri.Ravindra Budha Landge
Adv. U.S.Jagdale
Respondent(s)
Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T. Corporation, Paghar Div. and anr., Advocate - Smita H. Danke
M.S.R.T. Corporation, Through Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.Corporation Palghar Div.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Member
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Citation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgment |
| 23-02-2026 | Judgment |
| 13-02-2026 | Citation |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Industrial Court, Maharashtra found that MSRTC Corporation engaged in unfair labour practices by transferring complainant Ravindra Budha Landge from Vasai Depot to Palghar Workshop in December 2019, violating its own transfer guidelines and the MRTU & PULP Act. The court quashed the transfer order, finding the corporation failed to prove administrative necessity, violated seniority principles, issued the order outside prescribed transfer months (March-April), and transferred an employee nearing retirement—all without prior notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Industrial Court, Maharashtra found that MSRTC Corporation engaged in unfair labour practices by transferring complainant Ravindra Budha Landge from Vasai Depot to Palghar Workshop in December 2019, violating its own transfer guidelines and the MRTU & PULP Act. The court quashed the transfer order, finding the corporation failed to prove administrative necessity, violated seniority principles, issued the order outside prescribed transfer months (March-April), and transferred an employee nearing retirement—all without prior notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts