M/s Schindler India Pvt. Ltd vs The Employees State Insurance Corporation Advocate - Uttara Sawant — 73/2023

Case under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75/76. Status: Hearing below Exh._______. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Application ESI

CNR: MHIC010018432023

Hearing below Exh._______

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

Filing Number

1871/2023

Filing Date

28-12-2023

Registration No

73/2023

Registration Date

29-12-2023

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Member

Acts & Sections

Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75/76

Petitioner(s)

M/s Schindler India Pvt. Ltd

Adv. H.D. Pithadia

Respondent(s)

The Employees State Insurance Corporation Advocate - Uttara Sawant

Shri G. Gangte , The Deputy Director

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Member

06-03-2026

Hearing below Exh._______

03-02-2026

Hearing below Exh._______

06-01-2026

Hearing below Exh._______

04-11-2025

Hearing below Exh._______

07-10-2025

Hearing below Exh._______

Interim Orders

15-04-2024
Order below Exh---

Summary: The ESI Court at Mumbai granted interim relief to M/s. Schindler India Pvt. Ltd. on April 15, 2024. The court stayed the Section 45-A order dated August 8, 2022, which determined ESI contribution of Rs. 74,81,718/- for FY 2017-2018, and restrained the ESIC from initiating recovery proceedings pending final disposal of the main application. The court found that the applicant established a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the applicant, and irreparable loss would result without the interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The ESI Court at Mumbai granted interim relief to M/s. Schindler India Pvt. Ltd. on April 15, 2024. The court stayed the Section 45-A order dated August 8, 2022, which determined ESI contribution of Rs. 74,81,718/- for FY 2017-2018, and restrained the ESIC from initiating recovery proceedings pending final disposal of the main application. The court found that the applicant established a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the applicant, and irreparable loss would result without the interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Industrial Court, Mumbai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case