Bhartiya Kamgar Sena vs M/s. CIPLA Ltd. Advocate - R.N.Shah — 1261/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28/30. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010018172024
Filing Number
1831/2024
Filing Date
11-Dec-2024
Registration No
1261/2024
Registration Date
12-Dec-2024
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
2-Member
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhartiya Kamgar Sena
Adv. V. K. GEHLOT
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/s. CIPLA Ltd. Advocate - R.N.Shah
-
2.Umang Vohra, Managing Director
-
3.M/s. Cipla Limited
-
4.Pankaj Shitole, Factory Manager
Case History
-
30-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Member
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Member
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence
Member
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
Member
-
03-Oct-2025
Evidence
Member
-
18-Aug-2025
Documents Issues
Member
-
19-Jun-2025
Documents Issues
Member
-
15-Apr-2025
Documents Issues
Member
-
07-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Member
-
28-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Member
-
29-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Member
-
21-Jan-2025
Order below Exh---View PDF
Court Order Summary Case: Bhartiya Kamgar Sena v. M/s. CIPLA Ltd. & 3 Ors. (COM.(ULP) NO. 1261 OF 2024) Outcome: The Industrial Court, Mumbai rejected the union's application for interim relief and framed two preliminary issues regarding territorial jurisdiction and the complainant's locus-standee, which must be decided before the main complaint can proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Jan-2025
Order below Exh.______
Member
-
13-Jan-2025
Hearing on Interim Relief
Member
-
07-Jan-2025
Hearing on Interim Relief
Member
-
20-Dec-2024
Hearing on Interim Relief
Member
-
16-Dec-2024
Say
Member
-
13-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1261/2024
Court Order Summary Case: Bhartiya Kamgar Sena v. M/s. CIPLA Ltd. & 3 Ors. (COM.(ULP) NO. 1261 OF 2024) Outcome: The Industrial Court, Mumbai rejected the union's application for interim relief and framed two preliminary issues regarding territorial jurisdiction and the complainant's locus-standee, which must be decided before the main complaint can proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts