Bhartiya Kamgar Sena vs M/s. CIPLA Ltd. Advocate - R.N.Shah — 1261/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28/30. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010018172024
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
1831/2024
Filing Date
11-12-2024
Registration No
1261/2024
Registration Date
12-12-2024
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
2-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhartiya Kamgar Sena
Adv. V. K. GEHLOT
Respondent(s)
M/s. CIPLA Ltd. Advocate - R.N.Shah
Umang Vohra, Managing Director
M/s. Cipla Limited
Pankaj Shitole, Factory Manager
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Member
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 03-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Bhartiya Kamgar Sena v. M/s. CIPLA Ltd. & 3 Ors. (COM.(ULP) NO. 1261 OF 2024) Outcome: The Industrial Court, Mumbai rejected the union's application for interim relief and framed two preliminary issues regarding territorial jurisdiction and the complainant's locus-standee, which must be decided before the main complaint can proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Bhartiya Kamgar Sena v. M/s. CIPLA Ltd. & 3 Ors. (COM.(ULP) NO. 1261 OF 2024) Outcome: The Industrial Court, Mumbai rejected the union's application for interim relief and framed two preliminary issues regarding territorial jurisdiction and the complainant's locus-standee, which must be decided before the main complaint can proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts