Mangesh Ganpat Gandhi vs The General Manager, Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking Advocate - G.R.Naik — 955/2024

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Cross Examination Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Complaint ULP1

CNR: MHIC010014652024

Filing Number

1479/2024

Filing Date

16-Nov-2024

Registration No

955/2024

Registration Date

18-Nov-2024

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mangesh Ganpat Gandhi

    Adv. B. T. Kamble

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The General Manager, Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking Advocate - G.R.Naik

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Cross Examination

    Member

  3. 11-Feb-2026

    Cross Examination

    Member

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Cross Examination

    Member

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Cross Examination

    Member

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    Cross Examination

    Member

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Cross Examination

    Member

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Cross Examination

    Member

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Cross Examination

    Member

  10. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  11. 16-Jul-2025

    Documents Issues

    Member

  12. 18-Jun-2025

    Documents Issues

    Member

  13. 30-Apr-2025

    Documents Issues

    Member

  14. 01-Apr-2025

    Order below Exh---View PDF

    Summary: The Industrial Court Mumbai allowed the respondent's application to quash and set aside the "no written statement" order dated 30.01.2025. The court permitted the respondent (BEST Undertaking) to file their written statement on record, finding sufficient grounds in the interest of justice to allow the application despite the respondent's initial failure to file timely. The case will now proceed further with both parties' evidence on merit regarding the complainant's claim for unpaid retiral benefits, LTA arrears, and ex-gratia bonus with 18% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 01-Apr-2025

    Documents Issues

    Member

  16. 15-Mar-2025

    Order below Exh.______

    Member

  17. 17-Feb-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  18. 30-Jan-2025

    Ex Party Evidence

    Member

  19. 14-Dec-2024

    Lok-Adalat

    Member

  20. 04-Dec-2024

    Lok-Adalat

    Member

  21. 19-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 16-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 955/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court Mumbai allowed the respondent's application to quash and set aside the "no written statement" order dated 30.01.2025. The court permitted the respondent (BEST Undertaking) to file their written statement on record, finding sufficient grounds in the interest of justice to allow the application despite the respondent's initial failure to file timely. The case will now proceed further with both parties' evidence on merit regarding the complainant's claim for unpaid retiral benefits, LTA arrears, and ex-gratia bonus with 18% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case