Mangesh Ganpat Gandhi vs The General Manager, Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking Advocate - G.R.Naik — 955/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010014652024
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
1479/2024
Filing Date
16-11-2024
Registration No
955/2024
Registration Date
18-11-2024
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
2-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mangesh Ganpat Gandhi
Adv. B. T. Kamble
Respondent(s)
The General Manager, Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking Advocate - G.R.Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Member
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 11-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 02-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 28-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 02-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court Mumbai allowed the respondent's application to quash and set aside the "no written statement" order dated 30.01.2025. The court permitted the respondent (BEST Undertaking) to file their written statement on record, finding sufficient grounds in the interest of justice to allow the application despite the respondent's initial failure to file timely. The case will now proceed further with both parties' evidence on merit regarding the complainant's claim for unpaid retiral benefits, LTA arrears, and ex-gratia bonus with 18% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court Mumbai allowed the respondent's application to quash and set aside the "no written statement" order dated 30.01.2025. The court permitted the respondent (BEST Undertaking) to file their written statement on record, finding sufficient grounds in the interest of justice to allow the application despite the respondent's initial failure to file timely. The case will now proceed further with both parties' evidence on merit regarding the complainant's claim for unpaid retiral benefits, LTA arrears, and ex-gratia bonus with 18% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts