Kamgar Aghadi Union vs M/s.Quess Corp- Terrier Security and Integrated services Magna infortech business center in Mumbai Advocate - Satish C. Hegde — 190/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Hearing below Exh._______. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010011782022
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
1220/2022
Filing Date
13-07-2022
Registration No
190/2022
Registration Date
19-07-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
1-PRESIDENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamgar Aghadi Union
Adv. Ram R. Zade, UR
Respondent(s)
M/s.Quess Corp- Terrier Security and Integrated services Magna infortech business center in Mumbai Advocate - Satish C. Hegde
M/s.Terrier Security services india Pvt.Ltd.
TAta Power Company Ltd.
Adv. JAYEETA DAS,Mitra Das
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRESIDENT
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 06-02-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 30-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 16-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed Kamgar Aghadi Union's application to amend the complaint (filed under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971) by adding Tata Power Company Limited as Respondent No. 3. The court found that the respondents' written statement disclosed for the first time that the union members were deputed at Tata Power's facility, justifying the addition of this party. The complainant was directed to carry out the amendment by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed Kamgar Aghadi Union's application to amend the complaint (filed under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971) by adding Tata Power Company Limited as Respondent No. 3. The court found that the respondents' written statement disclosed for the first time that the union members were deputed at Tata Power's facility, justifying the addition of this party. The complainant was directed to carry out the amendment by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts