M/s.Schindler India Pvt.Ltd. vs The Director In charge ESIC and ors Advocate - Uttara Sawant — 54/2023

Case under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75-76. Status: Hearing below Exh._______. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Application ESI

CNR: MHIC010010942023

Hearing below Exh._______

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

Filing Number

1105/2023

Filing Date

28-08-2023

Registration No

54/2023

Registration Date

29-08-2023

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Member

Acts & Sections

Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75-76

Petitioner(s)

M/s.Schindler India Pvt.Ltd.

Adv. Mathew Abraham

Respondent(s)

The Director In charge ESIC and ors Advocate - Uttara Sawant

Shri.Nischal Kumar Nag

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Member

06-03-2026

Hearing below Exh._______

03-02-2026

Hearing below Exh._______

06-01-2026

Hearing below Exh._______

04-11-2025

Hearing below Exh._______

07-10-2025

Hearing below Exh._______

Interim Orders

28-03-2024
Order below Exh---

Summary The Employees' State Insurance Court at Mumbai allowed the interim relief application filed by Schindler India Pvt. Ltd. against the ESI Corporation's Section 45-A order dated 28/09/2020 that determined a contribution liability of Rs. 2,40,83,580/- for FY 2015-2016. The court stayed the implementation of the disputed order for 9 months after framing issues, finding the applicant made a strong prima-facie case, balance of convenience lay in its favor, and irreparable loss would result without relief. The case was adjourned for filing written statements, with directions to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Employees' State Insurance Court at Mumbai allowed the interim relief application filed by Schindler India Pvt. Ltd. against the ESI Corporation's Section 45-A order dated 28/09/2020 that determined a contribution liability of Rs. 2,40,83,580/- for FY 2015-2016. The court stayed the implementation of the disputed order for 9 months after framing issues, finding the applicant made a strong prima-facie case, balance of convenience lay in its favor, and irreparable loss would result without relief. The case was adjourned for filing written statements, with directions to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Industrial Court, Mumbai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case