M/s.Schindler India Pvt.Ltd. vs The Director In charge ESIC and ors Advocate - Uttara Sawant — 54/2023

Case under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75-76. Status: Hearing below Exh._______. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Hearing below Exh._______ Next hearing 06-May-2026 this date has passed

Application ESI

CNR: MHIC010010942023

Filing Number

1105/2023

Filing Date

28-Aug-2023

Registration No

54/2023

Registration Date

29-Aug-2023

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75-76

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s.Schindler India Pvt.Ltd.

    Adv. Mathew Abraham

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Director In charge ESIC and ors Advocate - Uttara Sawant

  2. 2.Shri.Nischal Kumar Nag

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  3. 03-Feb-2026

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  5. 04-Nov-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  6. 07-Oct-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  7. 12-Aug-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  8. 16-Jul-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  9. 10-Jun-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  10. 08-May-2025

    Order below Exh.______

    Member

  11. 06-May-2025

    Order below Exh.______

    Member

  12. 05-May-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  13. 24-Apr-2025

    Order below Exh.______

    Member

  14. 23-Apr-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  15. 19-Apr-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  16. 09-Apr-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  17. 19-Mar-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  18. 14-Feb-2025

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  19. 13-Jan-2025

    Say

    Member

  20. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  21. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  22. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  23. 31-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  24. 27-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  25. 23-Apr-2024

    Documents Issues

    Member

  26. 28-Mar-2024

    Order below Exh---View PDF

    Summary The Employees' State Insurance Court at Mumbai allowed the interim relief application filed by Schindler India Pvt. Ltd. against the ESI Corporation's Section 45-A order dated 28/09/2020 that determined a contribution liability of Rs. 2,40,83,580/- for FY 2015-2016. The court stayed the implementation of the disputed order for 9 months after framing issues, finding the applicant made a strong prima-facie case, balance of convenience lay in its favor, and irreparable loss would result without relief. The case was adjourned for filing written statements, with directions to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 28-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  28. 12-Mar-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  29. 26-Feb-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  30. 23-Jan-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  31. 21-Dec-2023

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  32. 21-Nov-2023

    Reply

    Member

  33. 16-Oct-2023

    Reply

    Member

  34. 27-Sep-2023

    Service Report

    Member

  35. 30-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 28-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Employees' State Insurance Court at Mumbai allowed the interim relief application filed by Schindler India Pvt. Ltd. against the ESI Corporation's Section 45-A order dated 28/09/2020 that determined a contribution liability of Rs. 2,40,83,580/- for FY 2015-2016. The court stayed the implementation of the disputed order for 9 months after framing issues, finding the applicant made a strong prima-facie case, balance of convenience lay in its favor, and irreparable loss would result without relief. The case was adjourned for filing written statements, with directions to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case