Kamgar Aghadi Union vs M/s.Lotus Suprising the city and ors Advocate - R.D.Joshi — 155/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 9 and 10. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010010442022
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
1083/2022
Filing Date
15-06-2022
Registration No
155/2022
Registration Date
21-06-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
1-PRESIDENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamgar Aghadi Union
Adv. A.G.Nagwekar
Respondent(s)
M/s.Lotus Suprising the city and ors Advocate - R.D.Joshi
M/s.Aqua Residences
M/s.Mumin enterprises
Adv. R.D.Joshi
Mr.D.k.Mandal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRESIDENT
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 13-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 09-01-2026 | Written Statement |
| 05-12-2025 | Written Statement |
| 24-11-2025 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court of Maharashtra rejected the interim relief application filed by Kamgar Aghadi Union on 24.11.2025. The union sought interim relief for 11 employees against M/s. LOTUS-Surprising the City and contractors for non-payment of salary arrears (Rs. 3,51,713/-) for November-December 2020 and alleged unfair labour practices. The court found that the complainant failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief, noting that the reliefs sought were in the nature of final relief and that there was insufficient material on record regarding current employment status of the employees; consequently, the application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court of Maharashtra rejected the interim relief application filed by Kamgar Aghadi Union on 24.11.2025. The union sought interim relief for 11 employees against M/s. LOTUS-Surprising the City and contractors for non-payment of salary arrears (Rs. 3,51,713/-) for November-December 2020 and alleged unfair labour practices. The court found that the complainant failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief, noting that the reliefs sought were in the nature of final relief and that there was insufficient material on record regarding current employment status of the employees; consequently, the application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts