Maharashtra Rajya Vidut Vitaran Co. vs Maharashtra Vij Kantrati Kamgar Sangh Advocate - Vijay P Vaidya — 33/2019

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 12(4). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Reference IT - Reference

CNR: MHIC010010052019

Filing Number

1209/2019

Filing Date

10-Dec-2019

Registration No

33/2019

Registration Date

24-Dec-2019

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

6-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 12(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra Rajya Vidut Vitaran Co.

    Adv. L.R.Mohite

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra Vij Kantrati Kamgar Sangh Advocate - Vijay P Vaidya

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Member

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Member

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Member

  5. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  6. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  7. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  8. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  9. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  10. 21-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  11. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  12. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  13. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  14. 14-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  15. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  16. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  17. 04-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  18. 30-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  19. 26-Jul-2024

    Documents Issues

    Member

  20. 05-Jul-2024

    Documents Issues

    Member

  21. 13-Jun-2024

    Documents Issues

    Member

  22. 29-Apr-2024

    Documents Issues

    Member

  23. 22-Mar-2024

    Documents Issues

    Member

  24. 26-Feb-2024

    Documents Issues

    Member

  25. 05-Feb-2024

    Documents Issues

    Member

  26. 11-Jan-2024

    Documents Issues

    Member

  27. 20-Dec-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  28. 21-Nov-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  29. 10-Oct-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  30. 25-Sep-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  31. 28-Aug-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  32. 17-Jul-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  33. 12-Jun-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  34. 17-Apr-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  35. 28-Mar-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  36. 10-Mar-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  37. 07-Feb-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  38. 20-Jan-2023

    Documents Issues

    Member

  39. 28-Nov-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member

  40. 04-Nov-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member

  41. 26-Sep-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member

  42. 29-Aug-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member

  43. 11-Jul-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member

  44. 14-Jun-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member

  45. 28-Mar-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member

  46. 02-Mar-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member

  47. 11-Feb-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member

  48. 11-Jan-2022

    Documents Issues

    Member

  49. 07-Dec-2021

    Documents Issues

    Member

  50. 17-Nov-2021

    Documents Issues

    Member

  51. 29-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    Member

  52. 01-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    Member

  53. 14-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    Member

  54. 12-Aug-2021

    Written Statement

    Member

  55. 14-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

    Member

  56. 17-Jun-2021

    Written Statement

    Member

  57. 20-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

    Member

  58. 26-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

    Member

  59. 25-Feb-2021

    Written Statement

    Member

  60. 11-Feb-2021

    Written Statement

    Member

  61. 19-Jan-2021

    Written Statement

    Member

  62. 19-Dec-2020

    Written Statement

    Member

  63. 02-Dec-2020

    Written Statement

    Member

  64. 03-Nov-2020

    Written Statement

    Member

  65. 19-Oct-2020

    Written Statement

    Member

  66. 12-Oct-2020

    Written Statement

    Member

  67. 16-Sep-2020

    Award.View PDF

    Case Summary Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. v. Maharashtra Veej Kantrati Kamgar Sangh Interim Relief Application Partly Allowed (16/09/2020) The Industrial Tribunal at Mumbai granted partial interim relief to approximately 3,231 contract laborers: the First Party must continue their employment until final disposition of the Reference, though the company retains freedom to proceed with new recruitment advertisements. The tribunal rejected the union's plea to restrain the filling of advertised positions, finding the contract employees are entitled to service protection subject to the eventual outcome of the case on whether the contracting arrangement is genuinely sham/bogus or whether permanent status should be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  68. 16-Sep-2020

    Written Statement

    Member

  69. 15-Sep-2020

    Order

    Member

  70. 11-Sep-2020

    Order

    Member

  71. 03-Sep-2020

    Order

    Member

  72. 27-Aug-2020

    Hearing

    Member

  73. 25-Aug-2020

    Hearing

    Member

  74. 03-Aug-2020

    Apparance

    Member

  75. 17-Jul-2020

    Apparance

    Member

  76. 02-Jul-2020

    Apparance

    Member

  77. 01-Jun-2020

    Apparance

    Member

  78. 20-Apr-2020

    Apparance

    Member

  79. 20-Mar-2020

    Apparance

    Member

  80. 24-Feb-2020

    Apparance

    Member

  81. 03-Feb-2020

    Apparance

    Member

  82. 01-Jan-2020

    Service Report

    Member

  83. 24-Dec-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  84. 10-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. v. Maharashtra Veej Kantrati Kamgar Sangh Interim Relief Application Partly Allowed (16/09/2020) The Industrial Tribunal at Mumbai granted partial interim relief to approximately 3,231 contract laborers: the First Party must continue their employment until final disposition of the Reference, though the company retains freedom to proceed with new recruitment advertisements. The tribunal rejected the union's plea to restrain the filling of advertised positions, finding the contract employees are entitled to service protection subject to the eventual outcome of the case on whether the contracting arrangement is genuinely sham/bogus or whether permanent status should be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case