Vishnulal Kori vs Hotel Grand Hyatt Mumbai Advocate - Puri/Paresh-1/Kharawal-4,5, — 26/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 44. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
Revn. Appln. ULP
CNR: MHIC010009832022
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
1022/2022
Filing Date
10-06-2022
Registration No
26/2022
Registration Date
17-06-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
6-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishnulal Kori
Adv. J N Tiwari
Respondent(s)
Hotel Grand Hyatt Mumbai Advocate - Puri/Paresh-1/Kharawal-4,5,
Juniper Hotel Pvt.LTd.
Adv. S Kharawal-4,5,
Arun Kumar Saraf
Fortpoint LEasing Solutions
Adv. Sunil Kharawal
Fort Point automotive Pvt.Ltd.
Adv. Sunil Kharawal
Sandip Kumar Bafna
Adv. Sunil Kharawal
Ramkumar Nadar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Member
Argument
Argument
Argument
Argument
Hearing below Exh._______
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Argument |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument |
| 23-02-2026 | Argument |
| 30-01-2026 | Argument |
| 06-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra rejected the application filed by Opponents 4, 5, and 6 seeking to delete Opponent No. 7's name from the revision proceedings. The court found that since Opponent No. 7 was made a party in the original Labour Court proceedings and may serve as a necessary witness, his deletion was not warranted at this stage of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra rejected the application filed by Opponents 4, 5, and 6 seeking to delete Opponent No. 7's name from the revision proceedings. The court found that since Opponent No. 7 was made a party in the original Labour Court proceedings and may serve as a necessary witness, his deletion was not warranted at this stage of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts