Akhil Bharatiya Kamgar Sanghatana vs M.s. Shri Mankeshwar Mechanical Works Advocate - G.D.Talreja — 5000350/2015
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Stayed. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010007202015
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
5000769/2015
Filing Date
24-09-2015
Registration No
5000350/2015
Registration Date
28-09-2015
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
6-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Akhil Bharatiya Kamgar Sanghatana
Adv. Sunil Patil
Respondent(s)
M.s. Shri Mankeshwar Mechanical Works Advocate - G.D.Talreja
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Member
Stayed
Stayed
Stayed
Stayed
Stayed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Stayed |
| 19-12-2025 | Stayed |
| 09-10-2025 | Stayed |
| 25-08-2025 | Stayed |
| 13-06-2025 | Stayed |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court dismissed respondents' applications (C-11, C-14, C-15, C-16) challenging the maintainability of the unfair labor practice complaint filed by Akhil Bhartiya Kamgar Sanghatan against M/s. Shri Mankeshwar Mechanical Works. The Court ruled that while the respondents' denial of an employer-employee relationship cannot automatically strip jurisdiction, the genuineness of their objection must first be determined based on pleadings, documents, and evidence regarding the respondents' bona fides before deciding jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court dismissed respondents' applications (C-11, C-14, C-15, C-16) challenging the maintainability of the unfair labor practice complaint filed by Akhil Bhartiya Kamgar Sanghatan against M/s. Shri Mankeshwar Mechanical Works. The Court ruled that while the respondents' denial of an employer-employee relationship cannot automatically strip jurisdiction, the genuineness of their objection must first be determined based on pleadings, documents, and evidence regarding the respondents' bona fides before deciding jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts