Akhil Bharatiya Kamgar Sanghatana vs M.s. Shri Mankeshwar Mechanical Works Advocate - G.D.Talreja — 5000350/2015

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Stayed. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Stayed Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Complaint ULP1

CNR: MHIC010007202015

Filing Number

5000769/2015

Filing Date

24-Sep-2015

Registration No

5000350/2015

Registration Date

28-Sep-2015

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

6-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Akhil Bharatiya Kamgar Sanghatana

    Adv. Sunil Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.s. Shri Mankeshwar Mechanical Works Advocate - G.D.Talreja

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Stayed

    Member

  3. 19-Dec-2025

    Stayed

    Member

  4. 09-Oct-2025

    Stayed

    Member

  5. 25-Aug-2025

    Stayed

    Member

  6. 13-Jun-2025

    Stayed

    I.c.member

  7. 04-Apr-2025

    Stayed

    Member

  8. 30-Jan-2025

    Stayed

    Member

  9. 19-Dec-2024

    Stayed

    Member

  10. 16-Oct-2024

    Stayed

    Member

  11. 07-Aug-2024

    Stayed

    Member

  12. 27-Jun-2024

    Stayed

    Member

  13. 23-Apr-2024

    Stayed

    Member

  14. 07-Mar-2024

    Stayed

    Member

  15. 01-Feb-2024

    Stayed

    Member

  16. 14-Dec-2023

    Stayed

    Member

  17. 29-Nov-2023

    Stayed

    Member

  18. 26-Oct-2023

    Stayed

    Member

  19. 21-Sep-2023

    Stayed

    Member

  20. 03-Aug-2023

    Stayed

    Member

  21. 08-Jun-2023

    Stayed

    Member

  22. 30-Mar-2023

    Stayed

    Member

  23. 23-Feb-2023

    Stayed

    Member

  24. 19-Jan-2023

    Stayed

    Member

  25. 22-Dec-2022

    Stayed

    Member

  26. 30-Nov-2022

    Stayed

    Member

  27. 11-Oct-2022

    Stayed

    Member

  28. 29-Aug-2022

    Stayed

    Member

  29. 15-Jul-2022

    Stayed

    Member

  30. 08-Jun-2022

    Stayed

    Member

  31. 25-Mar-2022

    Stayed

    Member

  32. 08-Feb-2022

    Stayed

    Member

  33. 20-Dec-2021

    Stayed

    Member

  34. 29-Oct-2021

    Stayed

    Member

  35. 17-Sep-2021

    Stayed

    Member

  36. 27-Aug-2021

    Stayed

    Member

  37. 02-Jul-2021

    Stayed

    Member

  38. 09-Jun-2021

    Stayed

    Member

  39. 28-Apr-2021

    Stayed

    Member

  40. 03-Mar-2021

    Stayed

    Member

  41. 20-Feb-2021

    Stayed

    Member

  42. 20-Jan-2021

    Stayed

    Member

  43. 17-Dec-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  44. 26-Nov-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  45. 29-Oct-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  46. 08-Oct-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  47. 24-Sep-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  48. 10-Sep-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  49. 27-Jul-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  50. 13-Jul-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  51. 29-Jun-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  52. 15-Jun-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  53. 01-Jun-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  54. 04-May-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  55. 02-Mar-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  56. 07-Jan-2020

    Stayed

    Member

  57. 22-Nov-2019

    Stayed

    Member

  58. 18-Nov-2019

    Stayed

    Member

  59. 30-Sep-2019

    Stayed

    Member

  60. 21-Aug-2019

    Stayed

    Member

  61. 20-Jul-2019

    Stayed

    Member

  62. 15-Jun-2019

    Stayed

    Member

  63. 10-Apr-2019

    Stayed

    Member

  64. 15-Feb-2019

    Stayed

    Member

  65. 24-Jan-2019

    Stayed

    Member

  66. 20-Dec-2018

    Stayed

    Member

  67. 02-Nov-2018

    Stayed

    Member

  68. 25-Sep-2018

    Stayed

    Member

  69. 07-Aug-2018

    Stayed

    Member

  70. 13-Jul-2018

    Hearing

    Member

  71. 29-Jun-2018

    Hearing

    Member

  72. 15-Jun-2018

    Hearing

    Member

  73. 08-Jun-2018

    Hearing

    Member

  74. 02-Feb-2018

    Hearing

    Member

  75. 05-Jan-2018

    Hearing

    Member

  76. 22-Dec-2017

    Hearing

    Member

  77. 28-Nov-2017

    Hearing

    Member

  78. 17-Nov-2017

    Hearing

    Member

  79. 03-Nov-2017

    Hearing

    Member

  80. 06-Oct-2017

    Hearing

    Member

  81. 22-Sep-2017

    Hearing

    Member

  82. 08-Sep-2017

    Say

    Member

  83. 01-Sep-2017

    Say

    Member

  84. 28-Jul-2017

    Order below Exh---View PDF

    Summary The Industrial Court dismissed respondents' applications (C-11, C-14, C-15, C-16) challenging the maintainability of the unfair labor practice complaint filed by Akhil Bhartiya Kamgar Sanghatan against M/s. Shri Mankeshwar Mechanical Works. The Court ruled that while the respondents' denial of an employer-employee relationship cannot automatically strip jurisdiction, the genuineness of their objection must first be determined based on pleadings, documents, and evidence regarding the respondents' bona fides before deciding jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  85. 28-Jul-2017

    Evidence

    Member

  86. 20-Jul-2017

    Order

    Member

  87. 07-Jul-2017

    Order

    Member

  88. 30-Jun-2017

    Hearing

    Member

  89. 16-Jun-2017

    Hearing

    Member

  90. 02-Jun-2017

    Hearing

    I.c.member

  91. 11-May-2017

    Hearing

    I.c.member

  92. 05-May-2017

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  93. 28-Apr-2017

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  94. 21-Apr-2017

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  95. 07-Apr-2017

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  96. 03-Mar-2017

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  97. 10-Feb-2017

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  98. 20-Jan-2017

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  99. 13-Jan-2017

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  100. 06-Jan-2017

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  101. 23-Dec-2016

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  102. 09-Dec-2016

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  103. 25-Nov-2016

    Argument

    I.c.member

  104. 04-Nov-2016

    Argument

    I.c.member

  105. 07-Oct-2016

    Order below Exh.______

    I.c.member

  106. 27-Sep-2016

    Order below Exh.______

    I.c.member

  107. 02-Sep-2016

    Order below Exh.______

    Member

  108. 26-Aug-2016

    Order below Exh.______

    Member

  109. 12-Aug-2016

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  110. 05-Aug-2016

    Cross Examination

    Member

  111. 29-Jul-2016

    Cross Examination

    Member

  112. 22-Jul-2016

    Cross Examination

    Member

  113. 15-Jul-2016

    Evidence

    Member

  114. 30-Jun-2016

    Documents Issues

    Member

  115. 07-May-2016

    Documents Issues

    Member

  116. 25-Apr-2016

    Written Statement

    Member

  117. 11-Apr-2016

    Written Statement

    Member

  118. 21-Mar-2016

    Order below Exh---View PDF

  119. 21-Mar-2016

    Written Statement

    Member

  120. 18-Mar-2016

    Order below Exh.______

    Member

  121. 15-Mar-2016

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  122. 11-Mar-2016

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  123. 08-Mar-2016

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  124. 18-Feb-2016

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  125. 12-Feb-2016

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  126. 05-Feb-2016

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  127. 29-Jan-2016

    Reply

    Member

  128. 22-Jan-2016

    Reply

    Member

  129. 04-Dec-2015

    Reply

    Member

  130. 20-Nov-2015

    Reply

    Member

  131. 06-Nov-2015

    Reply

    Member

  132. 30-Oct-2015

    Reply

    Member

  133. 16-Oct-2015

    Reply

    Member

  134. 09-Oct-2015

    Reply

    Member

  135. 28-Sep-2015

    Service Report

    Member

  136. 24-Sep-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  137. 24-Sep-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5000350/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Industrial Court dismissed respondents' applications (C-11, C-14, C-15, C-16) challenging the maintainability of the unfair labor practice complaint filed by Akhil Bhartiya Kamgar Sanghatan against M/s. Shri Mankeshwar Mechanical Works. The Court ruled that while the respondents' denial of an employer-employee relationship cannot automatically strip jurisdiction, the genuineness of their objection must first be determined based on pleadings, documents, and evidence regarding the respondents' bona fides before deciding jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case