M/s. Sandoz Pvt. Ltd. vs Bharatiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh Advocate - B.D'costa, J.P. PANDYA — 32/2017

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 12(4). Status: Say. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Say Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Reference IT - Reference

CNR: MHIC010006752017

Filing Number

675/2017

Filing Date

12-Oct-2017

Registration No

32/2017

Registration Date

13-Oct-2017

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 12(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s. Sandoz Pvt. Ltd.

    Adv. Satish Hegade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bharatiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh Advocate - B.D'costa, J.P. PANDYA

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Say

    Member

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    Say

    Member

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Say

    Member

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Say

    Member

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Say

    Member

  7. 03-Oct-2025

    Say

    Member

  8. 12-Sep-2025

    Say

    Member

  9. 22-Aug-2025

    Say

    Member

  10. 18-Jul-2025

    Say

    Member

  11. 20-Jun-2025

    Say

    Member

  12. 02-May-2025

    Say

    Member

  13. 28-Mar-2025

    Say

    Member

  14. 07-Mar-2025

    Say

    Member

  15. 31-Jan-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  16. 03-Jan-2025

    Order below Exh---View PDF

    SUMMARY: The Industrial Tribunal Mumbai framed two preliminary issues in Reference IT No. 32/2017 between Sandoz Pvt. Ltd. and Bharatiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh, dated 03.01.2025. The tribunal accepted the first party's objections that the reference may be barred under Section 59 of the MRTU & PULP Act and lacking territorial jurisdiction, as the second party failed to file any reply since 22.12.2017. The case is now set for hearing on whether the tribunal has jurisdiction and whether the reference is maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 03-Jan-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  18. 29-Nov-2024

    Say

    Member

  19. 04-Oct-2024

    Say

    Member

  20. 30-Aug-2024

    Say

    Member

  21. 02-Aug-2024

    Say

    Member

  22. 05-Jul-2024

    Say

    Member

  23. 10-Jun-2024

    Say

    Member

  24. 04-Apr-2024

    Say

    I.c.member

  25. 01-Mar-2024

    Say

    I.c.member

  26. 16-Feb-2024

    Say

    I.c.member

  27. 12-Jan-2024

    Say

    I.c.member

  28. 08-Dec-2023

    Say

    Member

  29. 03-Nov-2023

    Say

    Member

  30. 29-Sep-2023

    Say

    Member

  31. 25-Aug-2023

    Say

    Member

  32. 17-Jul-2023

    Say

    Member

  33. 12-Jun-2023

    Say

    Member

  34. 21-Apr-2023

    Say

    Member

  35. 10-Mar-2023

    Say

    Member

  36. 10-Feb-2023

    Say

    Member

  37. 13-Jan-2023

    Say

    Member

  38. 19-Dec-2022

    Say

    Member

  39. 25-Nov-2022

    Say

    Member

  40. 07-Nov-2022

    Say

    Member

  41. 17-Oct-2022

    Say

    Member

  42. 10-Oct-2022

    Say

    Member

  43. 26-Sep-2022

    Say

    I.c.member

  44. 22-Aug-2022

    Say

    I.c.member

  45. 29-Jul-2022

    Say

    I.c.member

  46. 24-Jun-2022

    Say

    Member

  47. 25-Apr-2022

    Say

    Member

  48. 25-Mar-2022

    Say

    Member

  49. 18-Feb-2022

    Say

    Member

  50. 14-Jan-2022

    Say

    Member

  51. 10-Dec-2021

    Say

    Member

  52. 15-Nov-2021

    Say

    Member

  53. 18-Oct-2021

    Say

    Member

  54. 20-Sep-2021

    Say

    Member

  55. 30-Aug-2021

    Say

    Member

  56. 30-Jul-2021

    Say

    Member

  57. 16-Jun-2021

    Say

    Member

  58. 30-Apr-2021

    Say

    Member

  59. 01-Mar-2021

    Say

    Member

  60. 02-Feb-2021

    Say

    Member

  61. 22-Jan-2021

    Say

    Member

  62. 11-Dec-2020

    Say

    Member

  63. 11-Nov-2020

    Say

    Member

  64. 19-Oct-2020

    Say

    Member

  65. 28-Sep-2020

    Say

    Member

  66. 10-Sep-2020

    Say

    Member

  67. 21-Aug-2020

    Say

    Member

  68. 29-Jul-2020

    Say

    Member

  69. 02-Jul-2020

    Say

    Member

  70. 03-Jun-2020

    Say

    Member

  71. 22-Apr-2020

    Say

    Member

  72. 18-Mar-2020

    Say

    Member

  73. 20-Feb-2020

    Say

    Member

  74. 24-Jan-2020

    Say

    Member

  75. 22-Nov-2019

    Say

    Member

  76. 07-Oct-2019

    Say

    Member

  77. 05-Sep-2019

    Say

    Member

  78. 02-Aug-2019

    Say

    Member

  79. 02-Jul-2019

    Say

    Member

  80. 04-Apr-2019

    Say

    Member

  81. 01-Mar-2019

    Say

    Member

  82. 25-Jan-2019

    Say

    Member

  83. 14-Dec-2018

    Say

    I.c.member

  84. 26-Oct-2018

    Say

    I.c.member

  85. 21-Sep-2018

    Say

    I.c.member

  86. 24-Aug-2018

    Say

    Member

  87. 27-Jul-2018

    Say

    Member

  88. 06-Jul-2018

    Say

    Member

  89. 22-Jun-2018

    Say

    Member

  90. 15-Jun-2018

    Say

    Member

  91. 04-Jun-2018

    Say

    Member

  92. 20-Apr-2018

    Say

    Member

  93. 06-Apr-2018

    Say

    Member

  94. 23-Mar-2018

    Say

    Member

  95. 22-Feb-2018

    Say

    Member

  96. 03-Feb-2018

    Say

    Member

  97. 01-Feb-2018

    Say

    Member

  98. 31-Jan-2018

    Say

    Member

  99. 18-Jan-2018

    Say

    Member

  100. 11-Jan-2018

    Say

    Member

  101. 22-Dec-2017

    Order below Exh.______

    Member

  102. 24-Nov-2017

    Service Report

    Member

  103. 02-Nov-2017

    Service Report

    Member

  104. 13-Oct-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  105. 12-Oct-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2017

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Industrial Tribunal Mumbai framed two preliminary issues in Reference IT No. 32/2017 between Sandoz Pvt. Ltd. and Bharatiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh, dated 03.01.2025. The tribunal accepted the first party's objections that the reference may be barred under Section 59 of the MRTU & PULP Act and lacking territorial jurisdiction, as the second party failed to file any reply since 22.12.2017. The case is now set for hearing on whether the tribunal has jurisdiction and whether the reference is maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case