Nana Shrirang Suradkar vs M/s. Western Regional Instrumentation Centre Mumbai Advocate - Mahesh Sukla — 204/2018
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010005582018
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
608/2018
Filing Date
08-06-2018
Registration No
204/2018
Registration Date
13-06-2018
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
2-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nana Shrirang Suradkar
Adv. A.D.Nimbalkar
Respondent(s)
M/s. Western Regional Instrumentation Centre Mumbai Advocate - Mahesh Sukla
The Asst. Registrar, M/s. Western Regional Instrumentation Centre Mumbai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Member
Argument
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument |
| 27-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 09-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 12-12-2025 | Cross Examination |
| 14-11-2025 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
This is a cross-examination transcript from an Industrial Court case (Compln.(ULP)204/2018) dated 06.03.2026, not a final court order. The document records the respondent's witness being examined regarding the complainant Nana S. Suradkar's employment as a clerk cum typist, with disputed claims about continuous service duration, leave rules, provident fund deductions, and termination procedures. The witness was discharged after cross-examination with no re-examination ordered, but no final judgment or ruling on the complaint is provided in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a cross-examination transcript from an Industrial Court case (Compln.(ULP)204/2018) dated 06.03.2026, not a final court order. The document records the respondent's witness being examined regarding the complainant Nana S. Suradkar's employment as a clerk cum typist, with disputed claims about continuous service duration, leave rules, provident fund deductions, and termination procedures. The witness was discharged after cross-examination with no re-examination ordered, but no final judgment or ruling on the complaint is provided in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts