Sunil Soma Dalvi vs M/s. India United Mill No.5 Advocate - M.V.Bhat — 201/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Documents Issues. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010004392025
Filing Number
503/2025
Filing Date
10-Jul-2025
Registration No
201/2025
Registration Date
10-Jul-2025
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
2-Member
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sunil Soma Dalvi
Adv. A.M.Koyande
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/s. India United Mill No.5 Advocate - M.V.Bhat
-
2.The General Manager,M/s. India United Mill No.5
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Documents Issues
Member
-
13-Feb-2026
Documents Issues
Member
-
30-Jan-2026
Documents Issues
Member
-
03-Dec-2025
Documents Issues
Member
-
19-Sep-2025
Documents Issues
Member
-
01-Aug-2025
Order below Exh---View PDF
Summary The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed the interim relief application in favor of the complainant employee. The court stayed the retirement memo dated 01.07.2025 and directed the employer (India United Tata Mill No. 5) to reinstate the complainant with full back wages and benefits pending final disposal of the unfair labour practice complaint, finding the complainant established a prima facie case that efficiency was never assessed before forced retirement, violating natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Aug-2025
Written Statement
Member
-
31-Jul-2025
Hearing on Interim Relief
Member
-
23-Jul-2025
Hearing on Interim Relief
Member
-
18-Jul-2025
Reply
Member
-
11-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 201/2025
Summary The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed the interim relief application in favor of the complainant employee. The court stayed the retirement memo dated 01.07.2025 and directed the employer (India United Tata Mill No. 5) to reinstate the complainant with full back wages and benefits pending final disposal of the unfair labour practice complaint, finding the complainant established a prima facie case that efficiency was never assessed before forced retirement, violating natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts