Sunil Soma Dalvi vs M/s. India United Mill No.5 Advocate - M.V.Bhat — 201/2025

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Documents Issues. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Complaint ULP1

CNR: MHIC010004392025

Documents Issues

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

Filing Number

503/2025

Filing Date

10-07-2025

Registration No

201/2025

Registration Date

10-07-2025

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Member

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union And Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Sunil Soma Dalvi

Adv. A.M.Koyande

Respondent(s)

M/s. India United Mill No.5 Advocate - M.V.Bhat

The General Manager,M/s. India United Mill No.5

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Member

06-03-2026

Documents Issues

13-02-2026

Documents Issues

30-01-2026

Documents Issues

03-12-2025

Documents Issues

19-09-2025

Documents Issues

Interim Orders

01-08-2025
Order below Exh---

Summary The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed the interim relief application in favor of the complainant employee. The court stayed the retirement memo dated 01.07.2025 and directed the employer (India United Tata Mill No. 5) to reinstate the complainant with full back wages and benefits pending final disposal of the unfair labour practice complaint, finding the complainant established a prima facie case that efficiency was never assessed before forced retirement, violating natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed the interim relief application in favor of the complainant employee. The court stayed the retirement memo dated 01.07.2025 and directed the employer (India United Tata Mill No. 5) to reinstate the complainant with full back wages and benefits pending final disposal of the unfair labour practice complaint, finding the complainant established a prima facie case that efficiency was never assessed before forced retirement, violating natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court, Mumbai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case