Arun Madhukar Pawar vs M/s Highland Solution LLP Advocate - D.H.Patil — 175/2021

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Reply. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Reply Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Complaint ULP1

CNR: MHIC010004382021

Filing Number

480/2021

Filing Date

17-Aug-2021

Registration No

175/2021

Registration Date

21-Aug-2021

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

1-President

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arun Madhukar Pawar

    Adv. Chaitnya Torgal, Chaitnya Torgal

  2. 2.Sayed Ahmed Nazir Ahmed Khan

  3. 3.Rajiv Babulal Chaturvedi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s Highland Solution LLP Advocate - D.H.Patil

  2. 2.The Director, M.s HIghland Slolution LLp

    Adv. D.H.Patil

  3. 3.The Manager, M/s Highland Solution LLP

    Adv. D.H.Patil

  4. 4.The Railway Goods Clearing and Forwarding Establishments Labour Board, Mumbai

    Adv. B.S.Mahamulkar

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Reply

    President

  3. 27-Jan-2026

    Reply

    President

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Reply

    President

  5. 11-Nov-2025

    Reply

    President

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    Reply

    President

  7. 22-Sep-2025

    Reply

    President

  8. 25-Aug-2025

    Reply

    President

  9. 05-Aug-2025

    Reply

    President

  10. 08-Jul-2025

    Reply

    President

  11. 02-May-2025

    Reply

    President

  12. 01-Apr-2025

    Reply

    President

  13. 17-Feb-2025

    Reply

    President

  14. 09-Jan-2025

    Reply

    President

  15. 17-Dec-2024

    Reply

    President

  16. 05-Nov-2024

    Reply

    President

  17. 01-Oct-2024

    Reply

    President

  18. 20-Aug-2024

    Reply

    President

  19. 23-Jul-2024

    Reply

    President

  20. 18-Jun-2024

    Reply

    President

  21. 19-Apr-2024

    Reply

    I.c.member

  22. 01-Mar-2024

    Reply

    I.c.member

  23. 23-Jan-2024

    Reply

    I.c.member

  24. 17-Jan-2024

    Reply

    I.c.member

  25. 21-Dec-2023

    Reply

    Member

  26. 23-Nov-2023

    Reply

    Member

  27. 18-Oct-2023

    Reply

    Member

  28. 06-Sep-2023

    Reply

    Member

  29. 26-Jul-2023

    Reply

    Member

  30. 26-Jun-2023

    Reply

    Member

  31. 24-Apr-2023

    Reply

    Member

  32. 20-Mar-2023

    Reply

    Member

  33. 13-Feb-2023

    Reply

    Member

  34. 16-Jan-2023

    Reply

    Member

  35. 12-Dec-2022

    Reply

    Member

  36. 16-Nov-2022

    Reply

    Member

  37. 07-Oct-2022

    Reply

    Member

  38. 07-Sep-2022

    Reply

    Member

  39. 05-Aug-2022

    Reply

    Member

  40. 15-Jul-2022

    Reply

    Member

  41. 28-Jun-2022

    Reply

    Member

  42. 17-Jun-2022

    Reply

    I.c.member

  43. 08-Apr-2022

    Reply

    Member

  44. 25-Mar-2022

    Reply

    Member

  45. 11-Mar-2022

    Reply

    Member

  46. 07-Mar-2022

    Reply

    Member

  47. 28-Feb-2022

    Reply

    Member

  48. 15-Feb-2022

    Order below Exh---View PDF

  49. 15-Feb-2022

    Order below Exh---View PDF

  50. 15-Feb-2022

    Order below Exh---View PDF

  51. 15-Feb-2022

    Order below Exh---View PDF

  52. 15-Feb-2022

    Order below Exh---View PDF

    Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed an application by Shivgarjana Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Sena to be impleaded as Respondent No.9 in an unfair labour practice complaint filed under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court found the union a necessary party since any order favoring the complainant workers would directly affect the rights of workers represented by the applicant union regarding work allocation at Jogeshwari Railway Yard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  53. 15-Feb-2022

    Reply

    Member

  54. 08-Feb-2022

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  55. 21-Jan-2022

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  56. 12-Jan-2022

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  57. 05-Jan-2022

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  58. 21-Dec-2021

    Hearing below Exh._______

    Member

  59. 07-Dec-2021

    Reply

    Member

  60. 22-Nov-2021

    Reply

    Member

  61. 12-Nov-2021

    Say

    Member

  62. 22-Oct-2021

    Say

    Member

  63. 08-Oct-2021

    Say

    Member

  64. 24-Sep-2021

    Say

    Member

  65. 03-Sep-2021

    Reply

    Member

  66. 27-Aug-2021

    Reply

    Member

  67. 24-Aug-2021

    Service Report

    Member

  68. 21-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  69. 17-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 175/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed an application by Shivgarjana Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Sena to be impleaded as Respondent No.9 in an unfair labour practice complaint filed under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court found the union a necessary party since any order favoring the complainant workers would directly affect the rights of workers represented by the applicant union regarding work allocation at Jogeshwari Railway Yard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case