Arun Madhukar Pawar vs M/s Highland Solution LLP Advocate - D.H.Patil — 175/2021

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Reply. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Complaint ULP1

CNR: MHIC010004382021

Reply

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

480/2021

Filing Date

17-08-2021

Registration No

175/2021

Registration Date

21-08-2021

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

1-PRESIDENT

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union And Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Arun Madhukar Pawar

Adv. Chaitnya Torgal, Chaitnya Torgal

Sayed Ahmed Nazir Ahmed Khan

Rajiv Babulal Chaturvedi

Respondent(s)

M/s Highland Solution LLP Advocate - D.H.Patil

The Director, M.s HIghland Slolution LLp

Adv. D.H.Patil

The Manager, M/s Highland Solution LLP

Adv. D.H.Patil

The Railway Goods Clearing and Forwarding Establishments Labour Board, Mumbai

Adv. B.S.Mahamulkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRESIDENT

06-03-2026

Reply

27-01-2026

Reply

16-12-2025

Reply

11-11-2025

Reply

28-10-2025

Reply

Interim Orders

15-02-2022
Order below Exh---

Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed an application by Shivgarjana Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Sena to be impleaded as Respondent No.9 in an unfair labour practice complaint filed under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court found the union a necessary party since any order favoring the complainant workers would directly affect the rights of workers represented by the applicant union regarding work allocation at Jogeshwari Railway Yard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed an application by Shivgarjana Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Sena to be impleaded as Respondent No.9 in an unfair labour practice complaint filed under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court found the union a necessary party since any order favoring the complainant workers would directly affect the rights of workers represented by the applicant union regarding work allocation at Jogeshwari Railway Yard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court, Mumbai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case