Maharshtra Kamgar Ekjut Union vs M/s Amplinno India Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - Vinayak Palande — 170/2021

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Hearing on Interim Relief. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Hearing on Interim Relief Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Complaint ULP1

CNR: MHIC010004212021

Filing Number

463/2021

Filing Date

11-Aug-2021

Registration No

170/2021

Registration Date

13-Aug-2021

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

3-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharshtra Kamgar Ekjut Union

    Adv. A.G.Nagwekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s Amplinno India Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - Vinayak Palande

  2. 2.M/s Mahindra Finance LTd.

    Adv. Manan Sanghai

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  3. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  4. 19-Nov-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  6. 11-Aug-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  7. 09-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  8. 05-May-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  9. 24-Feb-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  10. 06-Jan-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  11. 09-Dec-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  12. 13-Nov-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  13. 07-Oct-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  14. 10-Sep-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  15. 31-Jul-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  16. 26-Jun-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  17. 03-Apr-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  18. 28-Feb-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  19. 10-Jan-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  20. 24-Nov-2023

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  21. 10-Oct-2023

    Order below Exh---View PDF

    Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai rejected Respondent No. 2's (M/s. Amplinno India Pvt. Ltd.) application seeking dismissal of the unfair labour practices complaint on grounds of lack of maintainability. The court held that whether an employer-employee relationship exists between the union members and Respondent No.2, and whether Respondent No.2 qualifies as a principal employer liable for wages under Section 21(4) of the Contract Labour Act, are mixed questions of law and fact requiring oral and documentary evidence, and cannot be determined at the initial stage. The application was rejected with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 10-Oct-2023

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  23. 30-Aug-2023

    Argument

    Member

  24. 26-Jul-2023

    Order below Exh---View PDF

  25. 26-Jul-2023

    Order below Exh.______

    Member

  26. 27-Jun-2023

    Reply

    Member

  27. 28-Apr-2023

    Reply

    Member

  28. 17-Apr-2023

    Reply

    Member

  29. 22-Feb-2023

    Service Report

    Member

  30. 18-Jan-2023

    Service Report

    Member

  31. 14-Dec-2022

    Service Report

    Member

  32. 15-Nov-2022

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  33. 21-Sep-2022

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  34. 24-Aug-2022

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  35. 20-Jul-2022

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  36. 06-Jul-2022

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  37. 15-Jun-2022

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  38. 29-Apr-2022

    Reply

    Member

  39. 05-Apr-2022

    Reply

    Member

  40. 16-Mar-2022

    Reply

    Member

  41. 09-Mar-2022

    Reply

    Member

  42. 22-Feb-2022

    Reply

    Member

  43. 01-Feb-2022

    Reply

    Member

  44. 17-Jan-2022

    Reply

    Member

  45. 17-Dec-2021

    Reply

    Member

  46. 17-Nov-2021

    Reply

    Member

  47. 20-Oct-2021

    Reply

    Member

  48. 22-Sep-2021

    Reply

    Member

  49. 24-Aug-2021

    Service Report

    Member

  50. 18-Aug-2021

    Service Report

    Member

  51. 13-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 11-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 170/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai rejected Respondent No. 2's (M/s. Amplinno India Pvt. Ltd.) application seeking dismissal of the unfair labour practices complaint on grounds of lack of maintainability. The court held that whether an employer-employee relationship exists between the union members and Respondent No.2, and whether Respondent No.2 qualifies as a principal employer liable for wages under Section 21(4) of the Contract Labour Act, are mixed questions of law and fact requiring oral and documentary evidence, and cannot be determined at the initial stage. The application was rejected with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case