Philips Klin Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Murali Venkataramana Advocate - Satish Hegade — 25/2024
Case under Payment of Gratyity Act, 1972 Section 7(7). Status: Citation. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
Appeal PGA1
CNR: MHIC010004122024
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
413/2024
Filing Date
08-04-2024
Registration No
25/2024
Registration Date
12-04-2024
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
2-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Philips Klin Services (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Adv. H.Shivdasani
Respondent(s)
Murali Venkataramana Advocate - Satish Hegade
Life Insurance corporation of India
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Member
Citation
Citation
Argument
Argument
Argument
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Citation |
| 23-03-2026 | Citation |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument |
| 16-02-2026 | Argument |
| 31-01-2026 | Argument |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Appeal (PGA) No. 25/2024 before the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 at Mumbai, the application filed by opponents for adjournment was allowed. The Appellate Authority granted the adjournment due to the personal difficulty of the opponent's counsel, who suffered from a severe throat infection and could not attend court, despite the appellant's objection based on repeated previous adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Appeal (PGA) No. 25/2024 before the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 at Mumbai, the application filed by opponents for adjournment was allowed. The Appellate Authority granted the adjournment due to the personal difficulty of the opponent's counsel, who suffered from a severe throat infection and could not attend court, despite the appellant's objection based on repeated previous adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts