Philips Klin Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Murali Venkataramana Advocate - Satish Hegade — 25/2024

Case under Payment of Gratyity Act, 1972 Section 7(7). Status: Citation. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

Citation Next hearing 01-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Appeal PGA1

CNR: MHIC010004122024

Filing Number

413/2024

Filing Date

08-Apr-2024

Registration No

25/2024

Registration Date

12-Apr-2024

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Gratyity Act, 1972 Section 7(7)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Philips Klin Services (India) Pvt. Ltd.

    Adv. H.Shivdasani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Murali Venkataramana Advocate - Satish Hegade

  2. 2.Life Insurance corporation of India

Case History

  1. 01-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Citation

    Member

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Citation

    Member

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument

    Member

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Argument

    Member

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Argument

    Member

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Argument

    Member

  8. 28-Nov-2025

    Argument

    Member

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    Argument

    Member

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    Argument

    Member

  11. 31-Oct-2025

    Argument

    Member

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Argument

    Member

  13. 03-Oct-2025

    Order below Exh---View PDF

    Summary: In Appeal (PGA) No. 25/2024 before the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 at Mumbai, the application filed by opponents for adjournment was allowed. The Appellate Authority granted the adjournment due to the personal difficulty of the opponent's counsel, who suffered from a severe throat infection and could not attend court, despite the appellant's objection based on repeated previous adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 03-Oct-2025

    Argument

    Member

  15. 12-Sep-2025

    Argument

    Member

  16. 22-Aug-2025

    Argument

    Member

  17. 04-Aug-2025

    Argument

    Member

  18. 18-Jul-2025

    Argument

    Member

  19. 20-Jun-2025

    Argument

    Member

  20. 17-Apr-2025

    Argument

    Member

  21. 11-Apr-2025

    Argument

    Member

  22. 25-Mar-2025

    Argument

    Member

  23. 10-Mar-2025

    Argument

    Member

  24. 04-Mar-2025

    Argument

    Member

  25. 11-Feb-2025

    Order below Exh---View PDF

  26. 11-Feb-2025

    Argument

    Member

  27. 06-Feb-2025

    Order below Exh.______

    Member

  28. 31-Jan-2025

    Judgement

    Member

  29. 03-Jan-2025

    Argument

    Member

  30. 13-Dec-2024

    Argument

    Member

  31. 29-Nov-2024

    Argument

    Member

  32. 08-Nov-2024

    Argument

    Member

  33. 30-Sep-2024

    Argument

    Member

  34. 02-Sep-2024

    Argument

    Member

  35. 05-Aug-2024

    Argument

    Member

  36. 15-Jul-2024

    Argument

    Member

  37. 01-Jul-2024

    Argument

    Member

  38. 10-May-2024

    Service Report

    Member

  39. 15-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 08-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Appeal (PGA) No. 25/2024 before the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 at Mumbai, the application filed by opponents for adjournment was allowed. The Appellate Authority granted the adjournment due to the personal difficulty of the opponent's counsel, who suffered from a severe throat infection and could not attend court, despite the appellant's objection based on repeated previous adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case