Dattatray Pandurang Jadhav and ors.2 vs M/s. Prism Johnson and Ors.3 Advocate - J.V.Mhaske, P.A. Anaokar — 64/2019
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010002322019
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
253/2019
Filing Date
18-03-2019
Registration No
64/2019
Registration Date
18-03-2019
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
6-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattatray Pandurang Jadhav and ors.2
Adv. R.R.Yadav
Dilip Shankar Gaikwad
Yashwant Kumar Yadav,
Respondent(s)
M/s. Prism Johnson and Ors.3 Advocate - J.V.Mhaske, P.A. Anaokar
Atil Desai, Director
Shrirang Sondur, General Manager,
Pankaj Shrivastava, HR Manager,
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Member
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 18-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 03-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 19-12-2025 | Cross Examination |
| 04-11-2025 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court of Mumbai allowed the complainants' application to amend their complaint dated January 8, 2020, despite respondents' resistance. The court found the amendment was necessary to decide the real controversy between parties, did not introduce a new cause of action, and caused no prejudice to respondents. The amendment was granted subject to a cost of Rs. 1,500 and complainants were directed to carry out the amendment within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court of Mumbai allowed the complainants' application to amend their complaint dated January 8, 2020, despite respondents' resistance. The court found the amendment was necessary to decide the real controversy between parties, did not introduce a new cause of action, and caused no prejudice to respondents. The amendment was granted subject to a cost of Rs. 1,500 and complainants were directed to carry out the amendment within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts