Dattatray Pandurang Jadhav and ors.2 vs M/s. Prism Johnson and Ors.3 Advocate - J.V.Mhaske, P.A. Anaokar — 64/2019

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Cross Examination Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Complaint ULP1

CNR: MHIC010002322019

Filing Number

253/2019

Filing Date

18-Mar-2019

Registration No

64/2019

Registration Date

18-Mar-2019

Court

Industrial Court, Mumbai

Judge

6-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dattatray Pandurang Jadhav and ors.2

    Adv. R.R.Yadav

  2. 2.Dilip Shankar Gaikwad

  3. 3.Yashwant Kumar Yadav,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s. Prism Johnson and Ors.3 Advocate - J.V.Mhaske, P.A. Anaokar

  2. 2.Atil Desai, Director

  3. 3.Shrirang Sondur, General Manager,

  4. 4.Pankaj Shrivastava, HR Manager,

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Cross Examination

    Member

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Cross Examination

    Member

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Cross Examination

    Member

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Cross Examination

    Member

  6. 04-Nov-2025

    Cross Examination

    Member

  7. 07-Oct-2025

    Cross Examination

    Member

  8. 26-Aug-2025

    Cross Examination

    Member

  9. 12-Aug-2025

    Respondent Evidence

    Member

  10. 29-Jul-2025

    Respondent Evidence

    Member

  11. 15-Jul-2025

    Respondent Evidence

    Member

  12. 10-Jun-2025

    Respondent Evidence

    I.c.member

  13. 15-Apr-2025

    Respondent Evidence

    Member

  14. 18-Mar-2025

    Respondent Evidence

    Member

  15. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  16. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  17. 25-Feb-2025

    Cross Examination

    Member

  18. 18-Feb-2025

    Cross Examination

    Member

  19. 21-Jan-2025

    Cross Examination

    Member

  20. 14-Jan-2025

    Cross Examination

    Member

  21. 04-Dec-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member

  22. 19-Nov-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member

  23. 18-Oct-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member

  24. 24-Sep-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member

  25. 30-Aug-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member

  26. 07-Aug-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member

  27. 10-Jul-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member

  28. 19-Jun-2024

    Cross Examination

    Member

  29. 24-Apr-2024

    Cross Examination

    I.c.member

  30. 26-Mar-2024

    Cross Examination

    I.c.member

  31. 13-Feb-2024

    Cross Examination

    I.c.member

  32. 09-Jan-2024

    Cross Examination

    I.c.member

  33. 28-Nov-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  34. 27-Oct-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  35. 04-Oct-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  36. 12-Sep-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  37. 22-Aug-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  38. 19-Jul-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  39. 28-Jun-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  40. 14-Jun-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  41. 28-Apr-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  42. 29-Mar-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  43. 08-Mar-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  44. 10-Feb-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  45. 17-Jan-2023

    Cross Examination

    Member

  46. 13-Dec-2022

    Cross Examination

    Member

  47. 22-Nov-2022

    Cross Examination

    Member

  48. 12-Oct-2022

    Cross Examination

    Member

  49. 14-Sep-2022

    Cross Examination

    Member

  50. 17-Aug-2022

    Cross Examination

    Member

  51. 19-Jul-2022

    Cross Examination

    Member

  52. 24-Jun-2022

    Cross Examination

    I.c.member

  53. 07-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    I.c.member

  54. 19-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Member

  55. 01-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Member

  56. 09-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Member

  57. 23-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Member

  58. 02-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Member

  59. 19-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Member

  60. 05-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Member

  61. 22-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Member

  62. 14-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Member

  63. 08-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Member

  64. 17-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Member

  65. 29-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Member

  66. 20-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Member

  67. 20-Sep-2021

    Order

    Member

  68. 14-Aug-2021

    Order

    Member

  69. 06-Jul-2021

    Order

    Member

  70. 11-Jun-2021

    Order

    Member

  71. 07-Apr-2021

    Order

    Member

  72. 10-Mar-2021

    Order

    Member

  73. 03-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Member

  74. 19-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Member

  75. 04-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Member

  76. 13-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Member

  77. 11-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    Member

  78. 07-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    Member

  79. 12-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Member

  80. 20-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Member

  81. 26-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Member

  82. 31-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Member

  83. 08-Jan-2020

    Order below Exh---View PDF

    Summary: The Industrial Court of Mumbai allowed the complainants' application to amend their complaint dated January 8, 2020, despite respondents' resistance. The court found the amendment was necessary to decide the real controversy between parties, did not introduce a new cause of action, and caused no prejudice to respondents. The amendment was granted subject to a cost of Rs. 1,500 and complainants were directed to carry out the amendment within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  84. 08-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Member

  85. 13-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    Member

  86. 19-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Member

  87. 09-Oct-2019

    Evidence

    Member

  88. 27-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Member

  89. 01-Aug-2019

    Order below Exh---View PDF

  90. 01-Aug-2019

    Documents Issues

    Member

  91. 02-Jul-2019

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  92. 26-Jun-2019

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  93. 21-Jun-2019

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  94. 11-Jun-2019

    Reply

    Member

  95. 30-Apr-2019

    Reply

    Member

  96. 24-Apr-2019

    Reply

    Member

  97. 20-Mar-2019

    Service Report

    Member

  98. 19-Mar-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  99. 18-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court of Mumbai allowed the complainants' application to amend their complaint dated January 8, 2020, despite respondents' resistance. The court found the amendment was necessary to decide the real controversy between parties, did not introduce a new cause of action, and caused no prejudice to respondents. The amendment was granted subject to a cost of Rs. 1,500 and complainants were directed to carry out the amendment within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case