Maharashtra Employees Union vs M/s. Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. Advocate - Mahesh Sukla, Adv. Damania — 48/2020
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010001302020
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
136/2020
Filing Date
11-02-2020
Registration No
48/2020
Registration Date
12-02-2020
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
4-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra Employees Union
Adv. S.R.Mishra
Respondent(s)
M/s. Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. Advocate - Mahesh Sukla, Adv. Damania
M/s. Sahara India T.V. Network Ltd.
Sahara India R.
Subrato Roy, M/s. Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd.
Seemanto R Roy, Executive Director M/s. Sahara India Corporation Ltd.
Ehtiram Ali, HR Head,
Arshi Wasim
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Member
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 07-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 16-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 05-12-2025 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed the respondents' application for production of documents in Complaint (ULP) No. 48/2020 between Maharashtra Employees Union and Sahara India Commercial Corporation Limited. The court scheduled the matter for further examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the complainant's witness, while granting the complainant an opportunity to dispute the documents sought by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai allowed the respondents' application for production of documents in Complaint (ULP) No. 48/2020 between Maharashtra Employees Union and Sahara India Commercial Corporation Limited. The court scheduled the matter for further examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the complainant's witness, while granting the complainant an opportunity to dispute the documents sought by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts