Imran Ansari vs M/s. Heben Chartered Resources Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - Ashutosh Das — 28/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28/30. Status: Hearing below Exh._______. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010000482025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
Filing Number
49/2025
Filing Date
21-01-2025
Registration No
28/2025
Registration Date
23-01-2025
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
4-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Imran Ansari
Adv. A.G.Nagwekar
Respondent(s)
M/s. Heben Chartered Resources Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - Ashutosh Das
Mitul Ravilal Patel (Directors)
Dhairya Manish Patel (Directors)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Member
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 04-02-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 21-01-2026 | Say |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court at Mumbai rejected the complainant's application to amend the complaint by replacing M/s. Heben Chartered Resources Private Limited with M/s. Enkubator Resource Management as Respondent No. 1. The court found that the proposed amendment would change the nature of the employer without proper pleading on oath, and the complainant failed to establish that he received salary from Enkubator or sought relief against it. The application was dismissed under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure on 10.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court at Mumbai rejected the complainant's application to amend the complaint by replacing M/s. Heben Chartered Resources Private Limited with M/s. Enkubator Resource Management as Respondent No. 1. The court found that the proposed amendment would change the nature of the employer without proper pleading on oath, and the complainant failed to establish that he received salary from Enkubator or sought relief against it. The application was dismissed under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure on 10.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts