Bhakti Gajanan Masurkar vs General Manager, Greater Mumbai Milk Scheme Advocate - Shirish Shigwan — 11/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28/30. Status: Complaince on Order. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010000352024
Filing Number
34/2024
Filing Date
16-Jan-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
17-Jan-2024
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
2-Member
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhakti Gajanan Masurkar
Adv. Sharad Pathak
Respondent(s)
-
1.General Manager, Greater Mumbai Milk Scheme Advocate - Shirish Shigwan
-
2.Dairy Manager, Central Dairy Aarey
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Complaince on Order
Member
-
20-Feb-2026
Complaince on Order
Member
-
31-Jan-2026
Complaince on Order
Member
-
05-Jan-2026
Complaince on Order
Member
-
17-Nov-2025
Order below Exh---View PDF
Summary: The Industrial Court rejected the respondents' excuses for non-compliance with the High Court's order to pay gratuity within two weeks and found them guilty of contempt of court. The court directed that a contempt report be submitted to the High Court under Section 48(6) of the MRTU & PULP Act, holding that the respondents' failure to arrange funds in advance constituted disobedience of the court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Nov-2025
Complaince on Order
Member
-
10-Nov-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member
-
14-Oct-2025
Say
Member
-
02-Sep-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member
-
31-Jul-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member
-
19-Jul-2025
Say
Member
-
03-Jul-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member
-
25-Jun-2025
Say
Member
-
18-Jun-2025
Say
Member
-
19-Feb-2025
Say
Member
-
18-Dec-2024
Say
Member
-
26-Nov-2024
Say
Member
-
14-Oct-2024
Evidence
Member
-
07-Aug-2024
Evidence
Member
-
01-Jul-2024
Issues
Member
-
06-May-2024
Issues
Member
-
28-Mar-2024
Order below Exh---View PDF
-
28-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Member
-
14-Mar-2024
Order below Exh.______
Member
-
01-Mar-2024
Reply
Member
-
21-Feb-2024
Reply
Member
-
19-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2024
Summary: The Industrial Court rejected the respondents' excuses for non-compliance with the High Court's order to pay gratuity within two weeks and found them guilty of contempt of court. The court directed that a contempt report be submitted to the High Court under Section 48(6) of the MRTU & PULP Act, holding that the respondents' failure to arrange funds in advance constituted disobedience of the court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts