Roshan s/o Govind Washnik vs Yandraraj s/o Govind Washnik — 9/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order21. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 22nd April 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHGO080024432025
e-Filing Number
17-12-2025
Filing Number
143/2025
Filing Date
20-Dec-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
20-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Roshan s/o Govind Washnik
Adv. CHANDEWAR KIRAN BHAIYYALAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Yandraraj s/o Govind Washnik
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court disposed of the execution petition and directed transmission of the partition decree to the Collector under Section 54 CPC for statutory partition of agricultural land. The court held that once the civil court declares parties' rights and transmits the decree to the revenue authority, it becomes functus officio, and continuation of execution proceedings before the civil court is unnecessary and merely procedural. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
15-Apr-2026
Report
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
31-Mar-2026
Order
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
11-Mar-2026
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
25-Feb-2026
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
05-Feb-2026
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
22-Jan-2026
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
20-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2025
The court disposed of the execution petition and directed transmission of the partition decree to the Collector under Section 54 CPC for statutory partition of agricultural land. The court held that once the civil court declares parties' rights and transmits the decree to the revenue authority, it becomes functus officio, and continuation of execution proceedings before the civil court is unnecessary and merely procedural. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts