State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora vs Kavita Rajesh Maladhare Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R. — 1796/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO080024072025
Filing Number
2266/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2025
Registration No
1796/2025
Registration Date
17-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1077
Police Station
Police Station Officer Tirora
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora
Adv. Hemlatabai G. Nagdeve
Respondent(s)
Kavita Rajesh Maladhare Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for illegally possessing 8 liters of liquor valued at Rs. 1,600 seized on 15/11/2025. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the charge beyond doubt, as the key witness failed to corroborate the seizure details and the seized liquor panchnama (inventory) lacked proper authentication. The accused was acquitted and ordered to be released; however, the seized liquor was to be forfeited to the state, and the accused was directed to pay Rs. 7,500 as compensation under IPC Section 481. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for illegally possessing 8 liters of liquor valued at Rs. 1,600 seized on 15/11/2025. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the charge beyond doubt, as the key witness failed to corroborate the seizure details and the seized liquor panchnama (inventory) lacked proper authentication. The accused was acquitted and ordered to be released; however, the seized liquor was to be forfeited to the state, and the accused was directed to pay Rs. 7,500 as compensation under IPC Section 481. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts