State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora vs Kavita Rajesh Maladhare Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R. — 1796/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGO080024072025

Case disposed

Filing Number

2266/2025

Filing Date

17-12-2025

Registration No

1796/2025

Registration Date

17-12-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora

Judge

1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora

Decision Date

20th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1077

Police Station

Police Station Officer Tirora

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora

Adv. Hemlatabai G. Nagdeve

Respondent(s)

Kavita Rajesh Maladhare Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora

20-05-2026

Disposed

12-05-2026

Arguments

24-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

11-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

17-12-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

20-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court convicted the accused under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for illegally possessing 8 liters of liquor valued at Rs. 1,600 seized on 15/11/2025. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the charge beyond doubt, as the key witness failed to corroborate the seizure details and the seized liquor panchnama (inventory) lacked proper authentication. The accused was acquitted and ordered to be released; however, the seized liquor was to be forfeited to the state, and the accused was directed to pay Rs. 7,500 as compensation under IPC Section 481. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for illegally possessing 8 liters of liquor valued at Rs. 1,600 seized on 15/11/2025. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the charge beyond doubt, as the key witness failed to corroborate the seizure details and the seized liquor panchnama (inventory) lacked proper authentication. The accused was acquitted and ordered to be released; however, the seized liquor was to be forfeited to the state, and the accused was directed to pay Rs. 7,500 as compensation under IPC Section 481. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case