State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora vs Durgabai Parmeshwar Patle Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R. — 1794/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO080024052025
Filing Number
2264/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2025
Registration No
1794/2025
Registration Date
17-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1124
Police Station
Police Station Officer Tirora
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora
Adv. Hemlatabai G. Nagdeve
Respondent(s)
Durgabai Parmeshwar Patle Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Tirupati First Class Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Excise Act for illegally possessing 7 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 1,400 without authorization on 30/11/2025. The prosecution proved the charge through credible witness testimony and the seizure panchnama, while the accused's defense failed to create reasonable doubt. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 7,500 under IPC Section 278. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Tirupati First Class Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Excise Act for illegally possessing 7 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 1,400 without authorization on 30/11/2025. The prosecution proved the charge through credible witness testimony and the seizure panchnama, while the accused's defense failed to create reasonable doubt. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 7,500 under IPC Section 278. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts