State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora vs Durgabai Parmeshwar Patle Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R. — 1794/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO080024052025
Filing Number
2264/2025
Filing Date
17-Dec-2025
Registration No
1794/2025
Registration Date
17-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1124
Police Station
Police Station Officer Tirora
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora
Adv. Hemlatabai G. Nagdeve
Respondent(s)
-
1.Durgabai Parmeshwar Patle Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The Tirupati First Class Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Excise Act for illegally possessing 7 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 1,400 without authorization on 30/11/2025. The prosecution proved the charge through credible witness testimony and the seizure panchnama, while the accused's defense failed to create reasonable doubt. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 7,500 under IPC Section 278. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
12-May-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
24-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
17-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1794/2025
Summary: The Tirupati First Class Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Excise Act for illegally possessing 7 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 1,400 without authorization on 30/11/2025. The prosecution proved the charge through credible witness testimony and the seizure panchnama, while the accused's defense failed to create reasonable doubt. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 7,500 under IPC Section 278. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts