Sudha Ram Deshmukh vs Ram Krushnarao Deshmukh Advocate - Ajay EknathJi Meshram — 6/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 31. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

PWDVA Execution - Execution of order passed under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHGO080017312023

Steps

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

1604/2023

Filing Date

28-08-2023

Registration No

6/2023

Registration Date

28-08-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora

Judge

2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 31

Petitioner(s)

Sudha Ram Deshmukh

Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.

Respondent(s)

Ram Krushnarao Deshmukh Advocate - Ajay EknathJi Meshram

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora

14-05-2026

Steps

11-03-2026

Steps

21-01-2026

Steps

10-12-2025

Steps

20-11-2025

Steps

Interim Orders

02-04-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The arrest warrant against Ram for defaulting on interim maintenance payments of Rs. 3,000/month (ordered since October 2022) is set aside and he is released forthwith. Although the court found Ram deliberately refused to pay maintenance despite distress warrants, it held that proper procedure under CPC Order XXI (property attachment before arrest) was not followed, citing the Supreme Court's *Rajnesh v. Neha* guidelines. The applicant (Sudha) is directed to pursue recovery through appropriate property attachment procedures rather than criminal arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The arrest warrant against Ram for defaulting on interim maintenance payments of Rs. 3,000/month (ordered since October 2022) is set aside and he is released forthwith. Although the court found Ram deliberately refused to pay maintenance despite distress warrants, it held that proper procedure under CPC Order XXI (property attachment before arrest) was not followed, citing the Supreme Court's *Rajnesh v. Neha* guidelines. The applicant (Sudha) is directed to pursue recovery through appropriate property attachment procedures rather than criminal arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case