State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora vs Suraj Prakash Bariyekar — 870/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(f). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO080012032024
Filing Number
1098/2024
Filing Date
18-Sep-2024
Registration No
870/2024
Registration Date
18-Sep-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
447
Police Station
Police Station Officer Tirora
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora
Adv. Borikar M.K.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Suraj Prakash Bariyekar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Tirora stopped criminal proceedings against Suraj under the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking section 258 of the CrPC. The court found that despite sufficient opportunity, the prosecution failed to place the C.A. report on record and could not secure the accused's presence, making continuation of proceedings untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
06-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
29-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
04-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
30-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
09-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
28-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
03-Feb-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
02-Dec-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
18-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 870/2024
The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Tirora stopped criminal proceedings against Suraj under the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking section 258 of the CrPC. The court found that despite sufficient opportunity, the prosecution failed to place the C.A. report on record and could not secure the accused's presence, making continuation of proceedings untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts