State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora vs Diliram Sukhaji Tidke and Other 16 Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R. — 81/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379, 511, 34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO080008172019
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
Filing Number
762/2019
Filing Date
22-08-2019
Registration No
81/2019
Registration Date
22-08-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
FIR Details
FIR Number
642
Police Station
Tiroda
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora
Adv. Raut Manisha M.
Respondent(s)
Diliram Sukhaji Tidke and Other 16 Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R.
Nandkishor Ramesh Uke
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Mohhamad Sahid Jainul Sheikh
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Dilesh Rajesh Sahare
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Raju Kashinath Bhandarkar
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Ramu Soma Dongarwar
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Vikram Kailash Baheliya
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Dipak Gulabsingh Atre
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Madan Fekal Meshram
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Shrikant Shriram Dhabale
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Lakhan Kailash Baheliya
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Prakash Harichand Bhongade
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Sunil Girdharilila Bachwani
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Sanjay Chunnilal Dhabale
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Mannu @ Hemant Shobhelal Lilhare
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Mahendra @ Pappu Basantkumar Khandelwal
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Jaspritsing @ Bittu Pritamsing Bhatiya
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 16-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The court allowed the application filed by accused nos. 10 (Shrikant Dabale) and 15 (Hemant Lilhare) granting them permission to obtain passports for a foreign tour to Thailand. The court relied on the precedent that mere pendency of a criminal case is not grounds for rejecting passport applications, and both accused have fixed residence and immovable property within court jurisdiction. However, accused no. 15 must separately seek passport permission from the court handling another pending case (Crime No. 637/2018), and both are directed to inform travel dates in advance and not obstruct trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The court allowed the application filed by accused nos. 10 (Shrikant Dabale) and 15 (Hemant Lilhare) granting them permission to obtain passports for a foreign tour to Thailand. The court relied on the precedent that mere pendency of a criminal case is not grounds for rejecting passport applications, and both accused have fixed residence and immovable property within court jurisdiction. However, accused no. 15 must separately seek passport permission from the court handling another pending case (Crime No. 637/2018), and both are directed to inform travel dates in advance and not obstruct trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts