State of Maharashtra vs Sau.Muktabai Zankram Rahangdale Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R. — 8000071/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,468. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHGO080006552016

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

21st May 2026

Filing Number

8000598/2016

Filing Date

29-06-2016

Registration No

8000071/2016

Registration Date

29-06-2016

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora

Judge

1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

Tiroda

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 420,468

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. H.G.Nagdeve

Respondent(s)

Sau.Muktabai Zankram Rahangdale Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R.

Sanjaykumar Kuwarlal Sabale

Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.

Pradip Prabhudas Suryawanshi

Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.

Vinod Ghashiram Katre

Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.

Sunil Bhaktraj Sonewane

Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.

Shailesh Govind Patle

Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora

16-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

30-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

24-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

15-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

09-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

01-07-2024
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: In R.C.C. No. 71/2016 (State vs. Muktabai & Ors), the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Tirora ordered the trial to proceed despite the prosecution's failure to file the handwriting expert's report and other relevant documents, noting that sufficient opportunity had already been provided. Witness summons were directed to be issued to prosecution witnesses accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In R.C.C. No. 71/2016 (State vs. Muktabai & Ors), the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Tirora ordered the trial to proceed despite the prosecution's failure to file the handwriting expert's report and other relevant documents, noting that sufficient opportunity had already been provided. Witness summons were directed to be issued to prosecution witnesses accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case