State of Maharashtra through PSO Dauniwada vs Rajendra Kuwarlal Solanki — 417/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGO080005422026

Filing Number

515/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

417/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora

Judge

2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

142

Police Station

Police Station Officer Dawaniwada

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Dauniwada

    Adv. OMPRAKASH KESHAORAO MENDHE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajendra Kuwarlal Solanki

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.) based on his voluntary guilty plea, which was made after the court satisfied itself regarding the voluntary nature of the admission. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 300, with an alternative punishment of 10 days simple imprisonment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 417/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.) based on his voluntary guilty plea, which was made after the court satisfied itself regarding the voluntary nature of the admission. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 300, with an alternative punishment of 10 days simple imprisonment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case