State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora vs Salman Gaffar Sheikh — 50/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO080005342017
Filing Number
507/2017
Filing Date
05-06-2017
Registration No
50/2017
Registration Date
05-06-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
Tiroda
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora
Adv. H.G.Nagdeve
Respondent(s)
Salman Gaffar Sheikh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 50/2017, Tiroda Court, Maharashtra Judgment Date: 16 March 2026 Decision: The court acquitted accused Salman Gaffar Sheikh under IPC Section 379 (theft) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused illegally transported 7.5 brass gravel without proper authorization on 15 February 2017. Key witnesses were not presented, and no documentary evidence substantiated the charges. The court released the accused's bond and dismissed the forfeiture order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 50/2017, Tiroda Court, Maharashtra Judgment Date: 16 March 2026 Decision: The court acquitted accused Salman Gaffar Sheikh under IPC Section 379 (theft) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused illegally transported 7.5 brass gravel without proper authorization on 15 February 2017. Key witnesses were not presented, and no documentary evidence substantiated the charges. The court released the accused's bond and dismissed the forfeiture order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts