Kamal S/o Vithalrao Meshram vs The Cyber Cell Through — 38/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHGO080004482026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

423/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

38/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora

Judge

1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

000

Police Station

Police Station Officer Tirora

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kamal S/o Vithalrao Meshram

    Adv. KAWALE SURENDRA BABULAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Cyber Cell Through

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of BNSS, 2023 and ordered the release of Rs. 1,21,072.66 frozen in various banks following his online fraud complaint. The court found no infirmity in releasing the amount to the applicant's AU Small Finance Bank account upon execution of an indemnity bond, as the investigating officer and prosecution did not object and no other claimant came forward. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of BNSS, 2023 and ordered the release of Rs. 1,21,072.66 frozen in various banks following his online fraud complaint. The court found no infirmity in releasing the amount to the applicant's AU Small Finance Bank account upon execution of an indemnity bond, as the investigating officer and prosecution did not object and no other claimant came forward. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case